You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

0
0

[–] 16990921? ago 

The amount of kvetching is immense these days to prove that Yeshua wasn't a Jew.

Jesus Christ is a feeble construct, comprising of Yeshua and tons of other elements taken here and there, grown from a perverted form of Mithraism, etc.

If there was anything remotely "good" in an isolated, non-semitic branch of proto-Christianity—that is, a quasi undeground gnostic form that was leaps and bounds different from Jesus and focused on Kristos/Kristur—it's definitely gone as it has been destroyed during the massive hijacking that was the production of the New Testament.

It is pointless to even try to salvage something from the Kristos figure because it would mean rejecting the New Testament and trying to find what the non-Semitic, highbrow Adepts were running with. Not only is this nigh impossible but the name Kristos has been so stained that it's a massive waste of time and energy, and it will always conjure the image of that faggot kike who died on a stick.

0
0

[–] 17004913? ago 

The mithraism connection was debunked dude. Mithraism wasnt in the Christian areas until Christendom had already established its basic theology

0
0

[–] 17006931? ago 

You're a fucking retard. Your "christendom" was only put onto paper for real during the 4th century and kept being modified beyond and only started spreading from the heart of the empire during that time, Constantine -> Theodosius II.

The idea that Mithraism wouldn't even trickle down into some variants of the messed up, many varied and minor proto-christian cults practiced by both the plebes, the imported slaves, the gnostics and some liberal cuck-patricians is utterly laughable as the ideas occupied same time and space (Rome and beyond, 1st-4th century).

0
0

[–] 17004914? ago