You all know the bit. Kike journalism is lying propaganda, and defames people who speak out. But the "learn to code" meme goes farther than just backlash against the jewish owned media. For decades, jews and their liberals have shat on more bluecollar and working class jobs that white americans held. If these white communities suffered, they left rejoiced. They refer to these whites as "flyover country", "dumb hicks", and "rednecks". All of those terms are meant to shame rural and working class whites. A 'redneck' has a neck that is red because he is out working in the field instead of sitting at a desk with a vitamin D deficiency. A 'flyover' is someone who's not even worth looking down upon. It implies that liberals/kikes are above everyone else, but they're so high up, the people below them can't even be looked down upon.
Recently, when white coal miners were losing their income, these journalists told them 'lol just learn to code'. As if some 46 y/o dude trying to support his family has time to learn javascript. It was effectively shaming them for being defunct in neoliberal globohomo, mocking them for being left in the past. When it comes to spics, niggers, and every other oppressed minority, jews propose gibs programs, but when it comes to whites, they're told to just "stop being structurally unemployed goy". That's the irony, that they can't get out of structural unemployment, it's a form of demoralization against whites.
So when these kike journos lost their jobs, the schadenfreude reverberated throughout the news cycle. This snooty upperclass profession has now been dispossessed. They were happy little liars, being able to defame innocent people, push out propaganda, inflate their ego with their articles, and get fucking paid for it. Losing that dream job is akin to a holocaust to them, how dare the goyim take their livelihood? "Learn to code" is hilarious to throw back at them obviously because they use to say it, but because they're not worth employing anymore. Journalism in 2019 is not profitable unless people choose to donate to you. They can't deny that computer programming is already a saturated job market, because that would mean the white coalminers would be victims too. They can't say that it's difficult to learn coding, because that also would make whites victims of jew economics.
If you see any journalists, remind them that they got off easy with what they did. You don't have to mention anything about ropes, just that losing their job for ruining people's lives is relatively tame. What should we call this? Journocaust?
OP - https://8ch.net/pol/res/12726919.html
view the rest of the comments →
[–] 16423528? ago
Just because something might be possible in another language, it doesn't mean it is going to be as elegant to do. For example it would be a pain to do denotative continuous time programming in C, because C sucks at making abstractions. Just because a language being Turing complete means you can do any computation, it doesn't necessarily mean that you would want to do that computation with that language. As an aside, Turing completeness is overrated and leads to problems such as not being able to prove if your program enters an infinite loop doing nothing.
>>12729507
>>12729518
Neither of your posts include them saying, "Learn to code", or a paraphrase of that.
[–] 16423537? ago
all languages are built on top of C …. are you a complete retard?
[–] 16423538? ago
Take the FORTH pill anon.
[–] 16423536? ago
oh dear lord , ur a python programmer arent you.
this "elegance" is completely subjective. At its best it boils down to doing the same thing with less key strokes. In the end this all gets encapsulated anyways. You create and API that is elegant under the hood, I create and API that is "messy" under the hood. At the end of the day our interfaces are the same, this elegance means little.
At worst this elegance is used by engineers with extreme speciality in a particular language to implement something it a very specific unique way to try to squeeze as much logic in the smallest space and gain very little performance boosts in exchange for creating some very unique code that is difficult to maintain. We call this over engineering.
Get this vocabulary out of your head. An engineer does care about elegance. A good engineer cares about:
1) functionality
2) maintainability
3) performance
yes some programs adhere to special contexts by default (GO and parallel programming, Erlang and fault tollerance) but all programming languages can create interfaces, apis to makes
these tasks just as easy.
Because they are turning complete. Fuck your elegance, get the job done with the tool you know.
you understand that this statement makes no sense and shows your ignorance
Fucking shitty hipster programmers that only know javascript
[–] 16439451? ago
Nope. I do most of my programming in Idris at the moment.
sure
Well the problem isn't what happens under the hood. If your language is unable to make the concept clean over the hood, then we have reached a problem.
I'm an academic, not an engineer.
It does make sense. Idris let's me optionally sacrifice Turing completeness to be able to ensure that functions that I write will indeed terminate. You can also utilize the categorical dual of that and get the guarantee that you program will always be productive. I care about solving the problem. Whether or not I do so via methods that are Turing complete or not are besides the point.
>>12729743
So you are saying that to make an abstraction in C, you need to build a new programming language over it. I hope you can see how that is a very poor solution to the problem of wanting to create an abstraction.
>>12731520
PHP is literally jewish.
[–] 16424307? ago
They may be taking jobs in the sector but they sure are good at creating others with their incompetence lulz
>>12729742
Fuck that, there needs to be laws and standardisation on requirements for coding. Only the cleanest looking languages permitted. Anything less is simply a street shitting expression in code.