You can login if you already have an account or register by clicking the button below.
Registering is free and all you need is a username and password. We never ask you for your e-mail.
[–]16340130?0 points
0 points
0 points
(+0|-0)
ago
Whilst I generally hate e-celebs, and Molyneux is perhaps the most arrogant and narcissistic prick out there who is actually terrible at debating and regularly uses logical fallacies himself, despite being quick to criticise others for doing so; his 'documentaries' are actually top-tier. I do not have to like man or accept any of his beliefs to be able to admit that he is good at informing people about what happens in regards to high-publicity events and those things which the media downplays (like IQ and race, crime statistics, effects of immigration, McCarthyism, what happened in South Africa and the like). He really has done some fantastic and informative pieces.
I still can't stand the smug, fallacy-abusing prick; and worse than him his his horde of half-brained sycophants. Still, credit where its due. Overall he has been a positive influence on the masses, and seeing as he is ramping up his attitudes and is encouraging less diversity, more white babies and being ready for conflict; I am not worried that he's going to re-direct our energies into something ineffective as is the case with 'controlled opposition' leaders.
[–]16340957?0 points
0 points
0 points
(+0|-0)
ago
Go through his debate videos. He has one where he's talking to some crazies about flat-earth and UFOs; and he uses the argument 'do you really think you are smarter than all these people who came before you'? (Appeal to authority). He also ridiculed the one guy for working in a warehouse and implied that due to his 'bad job' he should not think that he is intelligent or capable of making an argument (ad hominem). He regularly uses rhetorical devices to exploit his often awkward and nervous callers. There's a host of other things he does regularly as well that I am not bothered to list. I pointed this out in one of those videos (either the flat-earth or the UFO one; and no I am not a flat-earther, not that it should matter) and I got shadowbanned (and still am to this day) from his channel.
[–]16340951?0 points
0 points
0 points
(+0|-0)
ago
Everytime he justifies jewish global power based on iq and christianity banning usury, without giving it the same investigation as he does say S Africa, which he incidentally completely omitted the role that jews played in apartheid, gold, diamonds and then the ripping apart of apartheid when it suited.
view the rest of the comments →
[–] 16340130? ago
Whilst I generally hate e-celebs, and Molyneux is perhaps the most arrogant and narcissistic prick out there who is actually terrible at debating and regularly uses logical fallacies himself, despite being quick to criticise others for doing so; his 'documentaries' are actually top-tier. I do not have to like man or accept any of his beliefs to be able to admit that he is good at informing people about what happens in regards to high-publicity events and those things which the media downplays (like IQ and race, crime statistics, effects of immigration, McCarthyism, what happened in South Africa and the like). He really has done some fantastic and informative pieces.
I still can't stand the smug, fallacy-abusing prick; and worse than him his his horde of half-brained sycophants. Still, credit where its due. Overall he has been a positive influence on the masses, and seeing as he is ramping up his attitudes and is encouraging less diversity, more white babies and being ready for conflict; I am not worried that he's going to re-direct our energies into something ineffective as is the case with 'controlled opposition' leaders.
[–] 16340133? ago
Name one time he used a fallacy.
[–] 16341908? ago
"Facts don't matter".
[–] 16340957? ago
Go through his debate videos. He has one where he's talking to some crazies about flat-earth and UFOs; and he uses the argument 'do you really think you are smarter than all these people who came before you'? (Appeal to authority). He also ridiculed the one guy for working in a warehouse and implied that due to his 'bad job' he should not think that he is intelligent or capable of making an argument (ad hominem). He regularly uses rhetorical devices to exploit his often awkward and nervous callers. There's a host of other things he does regularly as well that I am not bothered to list. I pointed this out in one of those videos (either the flat-earth or the UFO one; and no I am not a flat-earther, not that it should matter) and I got shadowbanned (and still am to this day) from his channel.
[–] 16340951? ago
Everytime he justifies jewish global power based on iq and christianity banning usury, without giving it the same investigation as he does say S Africa, which he incidentally completely omitted the role that jews played in apartheid, gold, diamonds and then the ripping apart of apartheid when it suited.