It's that time again. It's the time to see how many glow in the dark niggas are on right now.
What is t.avistock? It quote "applies social science to contemporary issues and problems." end quote
But they go farther than that… much farther.
They came up when I first started discussing about Bearenstein/Bearenstain. Something about a bump on the head and proficiency in math.
Well, you came close to the truth last time, let's see what happens this time
OP - https://8ch.net/pol/res/12697413.html
view the rest of the comments →
[–] 16266201? ago
Ok I thought of something useful to teach. As follows.
When you're poking around at reality and seeing what stuff is more flexible or changeable, you'll probably get some results at some point. What's exceedingly important is that you LITERALLY DO NOT GIVE A FUCK, NOT EVEN KIND OF. Of course it happened, because that's what things do. They happen. There is no amazement there. You're not amazed that your arm moves, even though we don't really have that mechanism figured out either. So the purity of your utter disinterest in the miracle you just witnessed is the very essence of allowing it to happen. It's not something you can fake, you have to actually not care.
I compare this to catching a bar of soap behind your back when it slips out of your hand in the shower. You've probably done it, and it is actually pretty complex as far as a motor skill. But when it happens naturally, you hand just moves on its own. And you don't even notice. That make sense? Super high-level shit right there, guaranteed to make you a boss if you figure it out.
[–] 16290060? ago
I get this post completely.
[–] 16290073? ago
I love you anon. Homo
>>12701255
I'll bite. My initial observation is that you're a bit cold and precise with your language, it suggests training. Of course, what the fuck do I come of as? Consciousness affecting random number generators is grade-school science fair science at this point. The CERN shit is superfluous, I agree. Wanna tell me what kind of contracts you've got? Agreements. I have a few.
>>12701446
Classic GATEfag, that's pretty confirmed
[–] 16266202? ago
TY anon
You made me think of this http://www.astralpulse.com/frankkepple.html I've been pecking away at it when I'm not battling (((GlowN_ggers))) on 8ch
[–] 16296271? ago
This link describes so many of the things I've experienced quite nicely - I think I have experienced most of what is spoken about.
>>12700137
Events appear to ripple forward and backwards through time creating synchronicities like in the picture.
Our consciousness is the basis of this reality. We are powerful and that is the most important thing they try to hide from us. Christianity and now Science being the main control structures.
[–] 16266714? ago
So I glanced through that article, I found a lot I agree with.
I have a buddy working on this. He's convinced that all the quantum particles are spinning like a vortex, which explains why things seem to disappear and reappear as they cycle through our phase. I think he's right, the project to prove is underway.
Probably the most foundational understanding. Why does information travel faster than light? Why can people accomplish remote viewing? ESP, telekinesis? Easily done if it's all one connected system. The entire thing is your extended body. Lots of philosophical ramifications in there.
I've taken to viewing the universe as a 4-d or more physical object. That means I can just shift my focus and inspect another aspect of the sculpture, as it were. This fixes most of the other problems one would have in constantly dimension-hopping.
It really is breddy comfy
→YOU ARE HERE
[–] 16266210? ago
Looks interesting, I'll give it a browse. Interestingly I tend to avoid researching into subjects without taking the most basic framework and practicing it on my own first. I like to get as close to an unbiased opinion of the core concepts as possible, and then if it seems worth understanding more of I'll find good books, or if possible IRL experts. Fun fact, most experts will carve off an hour or more for you if you're legitimately interested in their subject and you can hang with it intellectually.
>>12700597
I usually bring this up, high-IQ people and ESP/psychic effects. I was in GATE for my entire school career and we were given ESP tests and even entire modules every single year. Hah, I was always shit at them, I'm still not much of a mindreader. I've had some friends who were 10/10 on that stuff, though. You can't see someone be correct dozens of times in a row and not expect some mechanisms at play there.
[–] 16266205? ago
Nice pepe. Can I have it? For medical reasons of course.
>>12700527
Even us talking about "them" means that the programming didn't take hold.
Now of course it'll take some digging and some hunter-killer teams to root them out to make sure they don't come back, but we will win.
The light always beats the dark