It's that time again. It's the time to see how many glow in the dark niggas are on right now.
What is t.avistock? It quote "applies social science to contemporary issues and problems." end quote
But they go farther than that… much farther.
They came up when I first started discussing about Bearenstein/Bearenstain. Something about a bump on the head and proficiency in math.
Well, you came close to the truth last time, let's see what happens this time
OP - https://8ch.net/pol/res/12697413.html
view the rest of the comments →
[–] 16263736? ago
There will never be a half life 3 because We are half life 3.
CERN IS black mesa.
The Large Hardron Collider is the Anti-Mass Spectrometer
Black Mesa created the Resonance Cascade
CERN created the Mandela Effect
It's called HALF-life because HALF of us remember half of life being different via the Mandela Effect Resonance Cascade
htt p://half-life.wikia.com/wiki/Resonance_Cascade
https://archive.is/yszmI
htt ps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Micro_black_hole
https://archive.is/nJebq
htt p://half-life.wikia.com/wiki/Anti-Mass_Spectrometer
https://archive.is/cZSZ8
htt p://cms.web.cern.ch/tags/extra-dimensions
https://archive.is/2gxOQ
htt p://phys.org/news/2015-03-mini-black-holes-lhc-parallel.html
https://archive.is/qjoww
[–] 16272814? ago
>>12701303
[–] 16269677? ago
>>12700137
If there really is some sort of connection between CERN and Half-Life, what do you think it is? Is CERN consciously copying what Half-Life did, even including similar looking scienstists? Did Valve somehow predict what was going to happen back in the nineties, and made Half-Life based on that? I think the second option makes more sense. It's like the ancient Greek idea of the muse, that artists receive a gift from the muse, from some metaphysical force, and make their art based on it. It would explain why different people have similar ideas. It's not that great artists are necessarily so creative, but they are connected to something that gives them ideas.
This might be the reason why Half-Life 3 doesn't get made though. Either Valve noticed that stuff they wrote into their games happens in real life, and were spooked, or someone told them they shouldn't do the sequel because it will have serious consequences.
>>12700145
CERN creating the internet is a claim I've started hearing only in recent years. I don't know if there has been some reality shift though, since the claim seems to be that CERN created the World Wide Web, but ARPANET is still credited as becoming "the technical foundation of the internet". It might simply be that certain people don't want people to associate the internet with secret military projects.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ARPANET
https://home.cern/science/computing/birth-web
There is also the meme that Al Gore created the internet, which is supposedly based on misquoting Gore somehow.
[–] 16263751? ago
>>12700134
christ dude.
try to find some other forum already.
cern cannot be more transparent anymore.
it was all about the >pic.
[–] 16263738? ago
CERN and Sir Tim Berners-Lee is why we even have the World Wide Web. I always use that against anti-Whites when they're busy spewing their bullshit on the Internet, and they have nothing compelling to say back to me each time that I do.
[–] 16290714? ago
i thought darpa was though gore claimed credit>>12700145
[–] 16263744? ago
CERN created the internet.
or at least that's what the facts are in this timeline.
in my timeline CERN never created the internet.
in my timeline the internet was created in the earlier days of the military to create a new secret more secure form of communication, and the project was used by the earlier hackers who basically found and then began to use the internet for their own needs, and the military did nothing to stop it, but rather sat back and watched. they always wanted others to use it, because look at what it became today. today the internet is the largest worldwide surveilance system where people unknowingly or knowingly give their information to the entire world. However, it is beginning to appear more as though CERN may have hijacked the timeline for their own purposes and made themselves the original creators of the internet. in theory, how much money or power would one person hold if they were to go back in time and become the original creator of google, and never sell it?- let alone the entire internet?
here are some links, some are more conflicting than others- perhaps due to timeline residue. not everything gets changed or erased, similarly to how so many people remember things differently.
http s://home.cern/topics/birth-web
https://archive.is/Z1je2
htt p://www.todayifoundout.com/index.php/2014/09/history-internet/
https://archive.is/Mt8QO
htt p://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2407539,00.asp
https://archive.is/ESMHB
htt p://message.snopes.com/showthread.php?t=81408
https://archive.is/inrkk
htt p://www.whoishostingthis.com/blog/2014/11/11/arpanet/
https://archive.is/YZ4Y8
http s://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_the_World_Wide_Web
https://archive.is/5SDk5
http s://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_the_Internet
https://archive.is/Env8S
htt p://www.funtrivia.com/askft/Question50007.html
https://archive.is/vV2tl
htt p://techland.time.com/2012/07/25/how-government-did-and-didnt-invent-the-internet/
https://archive.is/y31vq
htt p://www.cs.ucsb.edu/~almeroth/classes/F04.176A/homework1_good_papers/Alaa-Gharbawi.html
https://archive.is/qp0lw