I just don’t get it. In a country with so many guns, yet the American far-right still hasn’t organized into a paramilitary resistance yet.
In South Africa, they have the AWB.
In Europe, they have Azov/Right Sector/IRA/UVF/etc.
In America, we have overweight boomers and BASED wetbacks and Trump supporting niggers with shitty ARs and pump action shotguns in some laughable “muh 1776” LARP group.
Hell, even the left has organized its own armed resistance (like the John Brown Gun Club and Redneck Revolt). All we have in America are those Oathkeeper faggots. When will the far-right organize? Or is it simply impossible in America? I know the Order was crushed before it was ever capable of becoming a real threat to the system. We’ve gotta think of something.
OP - https://8ch.net/pol/res/12628887.html
view the rest of the comments →
[–] 16169762? ago
This is not how any of this works. Right Sector and Azov are mercenaries working for the Ukrainian government - they're far right but they don't really fall under "militarized right wing resistance groups". They helped with the, primarily left-wing, pro-EU student protests back before Donbass split-off but now they're mainly used as a way to engage in extralegal conflict with the Donbass rebels and Russian support personnel and as well so that certain Ukrainian politicians acquire power and wealth for themselves.
The IRA, while predominantly catholic, was split between ideologically neutral republicans and socialists. I would hardly call the socialists that run much of today's IRA remnants "the militarized right wing".
The UVF, likewise, nothing like it. They were, essentially, a sort of SDF/loyalist faction though now they're kind of like the IRA in that they primarily exist as splinter groups of semi-radical, sometimes-violent good-boys-clubs.
Furthermore, on the topic of the IRA and UVF remnants, they're mostly either really old people or really young people LARPing around.
The AWB is the only group here that you could call a legitimate "far right resistance militia" or "the militarized right wing" and there's plenty like them in the US just like there's plenty of less extreme militias.
"boomers"
The reason the AWB has a lower boomer-to-zoomer ratio than your average southern militia is that South African kids grow up in a third world shit-hole where they're actively being victimized for their race. White American kids, by contrast, have nothing to worry about unless they live in very specific areas. So the legal responsibility to maintain the "government of the people, by the people, for the people" is mainly respected by older generations - especially since those generations were raised in an environment where this sort of sentiment was fostered by contrast to today's "you're not hip if you're not global" mood.
Also, because there's no real need for the American right to militarize until the very last moment. It's precisely because so many people have guns and it's easy and possible to congregate and communicate that these sorts of things aren't necessary - likewise the pressures are nowhere near so great.
Ukraine broke out into mass civil strife and outright civil war, South Africa is passing kristalnacht into law where there was already massive discrimination and violence against Whites in many areas, the Irish felt themselves under foreign occupation, the UVF formed in response to The Troubles and you get my point.
The American far right isn't going to organize because they're just as likely to be shot at by the authorities as other, even anti-authority militias.