You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

0
0

[–] 16082555? ago 

9 unironically

GTFO nigger

Common core (((lied))) to you.

The same way they redefine words they try to redefine basic math (common core) and science (only 2 genders).

0
0

[–] 16082655? ago 

That image is retarded.

20/5(22)

DOES NOT EQUAL

20/(5(22))

THESE ARE TWO SEPARATE THINGS.

Putting the 5(22) into the denominator changes the equation by adding parenthesis.

20/5(22) = 20/54 = 44 = 16

20/(5(22)) = 20/(5*4) = 20/20 = 1

Again, they are not equal because they are fundamentally different. It's not a question of "interpretation."

Common core is shit.

>>12666847

Welcome to clown world, where everything is bullshit.

>>12666849

Gender = biological sex.

The modern "redefinition" to mean "sexual orientation" is the corruption.

>>12666878

The correct solution is to use more parenthesis.

That's how engineering does it.

Remove all confusion.

>>12666886

It is morally imperative for genetically White people to oppose the ongoing genocide of the White genetic race.

Always circle back to this fundamental truth.

The White race exists. It is genetic. It is the product of 50,000+ years of separate evolution. (The preservation of the distinct tribes of White people is also important)

The multicultists/ globalists/ internationalists/ racemixers/ anti-Whites are supporting genocide. They are the villains. They are monsters.

>>12666888

Checked and Heil'd, computer anon.

>>12666931

You are wrong.

Again;

20/5(22) = 20/54 = 44 = 16

20/(5(22)) = 20/(5*4) = 20/20 = 1

There are parenthesis around the denominator.

20/5(22) =/= 20/(5(22))

Putting the 5(22) into the denominator adds parenthesis and changes the answer.

The "explanation" presented in the image in >>12666826 is incorrect.

>>12667161

The first sequence is 16, the second is 1. They are not equivalent.

0
0

[–] 16082780? ago 

Gender = biological sex.

(((1)))

Fuck off kike.

sage for triple post, sorry mods I'll stop I'm bored

0
0

[–] 16082660? ago 

The original problem was 6 ÷ 2(1+2).

I suppose it is a question of notation, but I think that 6 / (2*3) = 6 ÷ 2(3) because of the short hand notation of leaving the multiplication sign from the second term makes the 2 seem like a coefficient belonging to that term.

6 / 2 * 3 could be 9, but again it is a limitation of one line typing creating the ambiguity, so that to type it one would type 6 / (2 * 3) if the multiple of 3 were in the denominator, but when one writes it 6 / 2(3), it creates the impression that the 2 is a coefficient the 3 parenthetical group.

For clarity parenthesises should be used.

0
0

[–] 16082605? ago 

Common core tries to state that math is subjective. No fucking joke.

0
0

[–] 16082607? ago 

when infrastructure starts falling down because of this, remember I told you so -but you didn't listen.

0
0

[–] 16082592? ago 

>>12666847

order of operations or syntax bruh

0
0

[–] 16082563? ago 

gender

Doesn't exist. Remove it from your vocabulary for anything other than to say it doesn't exist.