You can login if you already have an account or register by clicking the button below.
Registering is free and all you need is a username and password. We never ask you for your e-mail.
Serious question - is Wikileaks reliable anymore? I thought it was considered compromised after the incident with the embassy - Assange was certainly considered compromised after that. Or dead.
I believe the content they published was all 100% genuine. I think the real question is what about the content they chose not to publish, what was the overall goal or motive. JA made many claims of materials he was going to release and never did. I also find it curious looking back knowing what we know now that JA was on the cover of time magazine. Whatever this started as he dropped some nuggets along the way and is getting his shit pushed in now for it.
view the rest of the comments →
[–] FPSFairy 1 point 3 points 4 points (+4|-1) ago
Serious question - is Wikileaks reliable anymore? I thought it was considered compromised after the incident with the embassy - Assange was certainly considered compromised after that. Or dead.
[–] VicariousJambi 0 points 4 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago
iirc it was only their twitter account that was compromised.
[–] StarbuckAndCasey 0 points 3 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago
Julian gave Wikileaks oversight powers to his editor-in-chief so that the organization would not go rudderless during his detainment. https://twitter.com/wikileaks/status/1045034219939016704
[–] LostandFound [S] 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
I believe the content they published was all 100% genuine. I think the real question is what about the content they chose not to publish, what was the overall goal or motive. JA made many claims of materials he was going to release and never did. I also find it curious looking back knowing what we know now that JA was on the cover of time magazine. Whatever this started as he dropped some nuggets along the way and is getting his shit pushed in now for it.