[–] Walk1 0 points 19 points (+19|-0) ago 

Its all about forcing their sexual perversity on others that drives the LGBTQ to be who they are, because at the end of the day their live an artificial and forced lifestyle that revolves simply around sexual pleasure, which is something you don't encounter with heterosexuals.

[–] draaaak 0 points 12 points (+12|-0) ago 

[–] GapingAnus 0 points 12 points (+12|-0) ago 

Europe playing 8d reverse backgammon to deal with the homos.

[–] iLuvJews 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

8d reverse backgammon

lol

[–] freedomite 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

Ewww, you're going to get GRIDS all over the concrete.

[–] dundundunnnnn 1 points 7 points (+8|-1) ago 

Did you hear about the 10 year old drag show in NY last week?

https://imgoat.com/uploads/7e6c85504c/172422.jpg

[–] Fuzzycrumpkin 0 points 6 points (+6|-0) ago  (edited ago)

I think the percentage for the proportion of males to women is the only thing I have a problem with. I think that women are vastly underreported, much like that of female on male rape. There is also a trend for our society to not call women child molesters as well, women might be prosecuted under a different classification.

[–] FSHLLtOW 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

You are exactly right. Just think about all the female teachers screwing their students. A lot of the time it is not prosecuted as child molestation.

[–] TheAntiZealot 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

I checked the math; it's good.

[–] SIayfire122 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

There are a couple problems with the math, and it depends on how inclusive "gay" is. If the term includes bisexuals, then their numbers may count against straights. If a bisexual has 5 victims, 1 boy and 4 girls, the girls would count against the straight category. It also assumes a gay man (not bi) wouldn't fuck a little girl if that's the child he got.

Similarly, 3% is the on the high end of the estimation. If gays are only 2%, that 11.5% would increase to 17%. If gays are only 1%, then the percentage would be the full 35% (really 33.333% if exactly one third).

[–] TheAntiZealot 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

There are a couple problems with the math, and it depends on how inclusive "gay" is. If the term includes bisexuals, then their numbers may count against straights. If a bisexual has 5 victims, 1 boy and 4 girls, the girls would count against the straight category. It also assumes a gay man (not bi) wouldn't fuck a little girl if that's the child he got.

That's not a math problem; that's a definitions problem. Also known as semantics. And a fair point.

Similarly, 3% is the on the high end of the estimation. If gays are only 2%, that 11.5% would increase to 17%. If gays are only 1%, then the percentage would be the full 35% (really 33.333% if exactly one third).

True. Very valid and worth noting. Thanks.

Leftists would prefer if homosexuals were far above 3% of the total population. Truly deathmongers.

[–] iLuvJews 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

Have you guys noticed A.S.A.P. science is a channel with two gay dudes who are always "educating" anonymous people's children online about sex, masturbation and drugs?

[–] iLuvJews 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

Basically the figures I keep reading say that pedophilia is 20x as likely in the gay community as it is in the straight community.

Which makes sense because besides slutty single mothers, black people, white trash and hispanics, you almost never see straight people sexualizing children.

[–] WeAreScrewed 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

That's not all they want to do to kids.

load more comments ▼ (6 remaining)