You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–] krier55 1 points 0 points (+1|-1) ago 

It’s a doll . Sick as shit but not illegal

[–] SweetChicken 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago  (edited ago)

And this section as well.

Images of child pornography are not protected under First Amendment rights, and are illegal contraband under federal law. Section 2256 of Title 18, United States Code, defines child pornography as any visual depiction of sexually explicit conduct involving a minor (someone under 18 years of age). Visual depictions include photographs, videos, digital or computer generated images indistinguishable from an actual minor, and images created, adapted, or modified, but appear to depict an identifiable, actual minor. Undeveloped film, undeveloped videotape, and electronically stored data that can be converted into a visual image of child pornography are also deemed illegal visual depictions under federal law.

The raping a baby doll video clearly falls in this category.

[–] SweetChicken 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago  (edited ago)

I believe you are incorrect. When I find the statute I'll post it.


Specifically, Section 2251 makes it illegal to persuade, induce, entice, or coerce a minor to engage in sexually explicit conduct for purposes of producing visual depictions of that conduct.

I believe this section clearly pertains to the picture with the child's hand on his groin.