This user has mostly submitted to the following subverses (showing top 5):
24 submissions to pizzagate
6 submissions to pizzagateproof
3 submissions to pizzagatewhatever
2 submissions to Conspiracy
1 submissions to pizzagateTNT
This user has so far shared a total of 15 links, started a total of 22 discussions and submitted a total of 504 comments.
Submissions: This user has upvoted 243 and downvoted 64 submissions.
Comments: This user has upvoted 717 and downvoted 258 comments.
5 highest rated submissions:
Kids missing from national parks ... Locations line up with military tunnels, submitted: 5/15/2017 1:07:55 AM, 118 points (+119|-1)
At Least 231 Children Abused at Catholic Boys' Choir Run by Pope Benedict's Brother, submitted: 5/15/2017 12:14:46 PM, 84 points (+85|-1)
Fifteen kids reported this pedophile. They left him in the classroom anyway., submitted: 6/29/2017 11:07:01 AM, 79 points (+82|-3)
Du Pont Heir who Raped 3 Year old Child let off by Judge: 'No Need for Prison', submitted: 6/21/2017 6:32:50 PM, 78 points (+78|-0)
Google streetview of Pegasus Museum is GONE!, submitted: 5/12/2017 10:47:20 PM, 73 points (+74|-1)
5 lowest rated submissions:
Possible photo of young James Alefantis?, submitted: 5/26/2017 11:33:10 AM, 1 points (+1|-0)
Magnetometer on 9/11 Shows Exotic Weapons Evidence, submitted: 8/30/2017 9:39:07 PM, 1 points (+2|-1)
HIV-Positive Man Sentenced For Sexual Servitude, Human Trafficking, submitted: 5/13/2017 7:36:33 AM, 2 points (+3|-1)
Massive text document with Pizzagate links, submitted: 2/17/2017 2:37:19 AM, 3 points (+3|-0)
(From 2013) Court ruling means some Okla. sex offenders will be removed from registry, submitted: 7/7/2017 1:49:09 AM, 3 points (+3|-0)
3 highest rated comments:
twistedmac11 0 points 19 points 19 points (+19|-0) ago
THANK YOU. It's amazing how so many people have such a desire to see justice that they put their blinders on and refuse to see reality. We cannot rely on a savior. WE have to bring about the changes we want to see. No one is going to do it for us. Trump didn't surprise his way into the presidency, he was placed there. The elections are rigged; he wouldn't be president if he wasn't supposed to be. He's not our guy.
twistedmac11 1 points 12 points 13 points (+13|-1) ago
"I don't want to lend my voice when I can't control how it's being directed." THIS. They continue to try to spin things against us to make us look bad.
twistedmac11 1 points 10 points 11 points (+11|-1) ago
Same. I think it's an attempt to make us go after an innocent company in order to discredit us. There is no proof of anything out of the ordinary going on at Glacier Dental. I even saw someone go on about "OMG THEY HAVE DENTAL CHAIRS THERE, THEY MUST BE USING THEM FOR SOMETHING SINISTER".........but it's a dental office. Rofl. The one bad review for them is weird, but doesn't automatically make me think pedophilia or trafficking, and it's the only bad review that I saw for them. The threads are probably getting scrubbed bc there is no evidence, and leaving that stuff up is a lawsuit waiting to happen.
My question is, are the people pushing this shills? Or were they fed this info from somewhere and fell for it? Should we be looking at their previous submissions to see what other disinfo they may have spread?
3 lowest rated comments:
twistedmac11 5 points -2 points 3 points (+3|-5) ago
That’s called Ad Hominem, attempting to discredit info bc you don’t like the source. That’s just ignorant. If the present is good, who cares how shitty the wrapping paper is?
twistedmac11 2 points -2 points 0 points (+0|-2) ago
Am i missing something here? You made a claim saying
I DID A CURSORY LOOK AT NCMEC POSTINGS FOR A FEW STATES AND FOUND SOME ODD THINGS which made me wonder if the pedophiles don't shop NCMEC for their kids. ARE THE NAMES OF THE KIDS MISSING IN VIRGINIA REALLY THE KID'S NAME? ARE THEY THE CONTACT PERSON'S NAME? IS THE POST JUST SO THE 'BUYERS' CAN SEE A DESCRIPTION OF THE KIDS AVAILABLE FOR SALE?
And then go on to talk about the absurd amount of missing info on kids missing from Virginia, which was covered months ago. Where's the rest of the info to back up your theory? Honestly this seems like a shill post, with a bunch of capital/bold letters, a big claim, and nothing to back it up except recycled info. Maybe I'm missing something?
twistedmac11 1 points -1 points 0 points (+0|-1) ago
I apologize if this has been mentioned already, but I wanted to get it in before you close this up. I recently had a post deleted by M_F citing Rule 1: https://voat.co/v/pizzagate/2128750
I messaged M_F two or three times asking for an explanation, considering my post touched on the Catholic Church covering up yet another serial molester, but got no response. Finally I messaged @vindicator, who told me they wouldn't have deleted my post had it been up to them.
While I understand that the Catholic church covering up pedophiles doesn't necessarily involve elites, considering how powerful the Vatican is (and how similar it is, legally speaking, to Washington DC & London), I think posts involving the Catholic church covering for pedophiles should fall under Rule 1. I've been working on another angle involving pedophilia coverups by the church for the last couple of weeks, but I'm hesitant to post anything here for fear it will get deleted.
I think it would help if the mods could agree on how to apply Rule 1 in general.