Profile overview for swingvoater.
Submission statistics

This user has mostly submitted to the following subverses (showing top 5):

3 submissions to AskVoat

This user has so far shared a total of 1 links, started a total of 2 discussions and submitted a total of 77 comments.

Voting habits

Submissions: This user has upvoted 8 and downvoted 43 submissions.

Comments: This user has upvoted 17 and downvoted 18 comments.

Submission ratings

5 highest rated submissions:

5 lowest rated submissions:

Comment ratings

3 highest rated comments:

Has @SHE used their Mod role to remove posts that they don't agree with? submitted by swingvoater to AskVoat

swingvoater 2 points 105 points (+107|-2) ago

(I made sure to include the '?' !)

If this happened in subs that they started, no problem.

But, typical SJW behaviour is to find something popular, worm their way in, and then start forcing SJW rules on everyone else.

So, if they were simply added as a mod to a popular sub such as /v/askvoat after it was already popular, and then started to perform SJW/SRS type actions, such as deleting posts because they were triggered, then that would be somewhat interesting.

Donald Trump blames political correctness for backlash over calling women 'fat pigs' submitted by i_am_not_crazy to news

swingvoater 1 points 38 points (+39|-1) ago

Why is this news? He's right.

He didn't call Women fat pigs, in that he didn't say that all women were fat pigs. He called some specific women fat pigs, mostly Rosie.

That being the case, the only reason why the MSM is running articles about it is that they are trying to get people roused up against him, and they are trying to use political correctness to do it. If it wasn't for political correctness no one would care. Therefore, he is 100% correct to blame political correctness for any anyone being upset.

It would be like other people getting upset for calling a Mexican laborer working on your lawn lazy. If it's true, and if you aren't calling Mexicans in general lazy, what's the problem?

Has @SHE used their Mod role to remove posts that they don't agree with? submitted by swingvoater to AskVoat

swingvoater 3 points 35 points (+38|-3) ago

But, that's a pretty big one.

@she mentions a rule against soapboxing as the reason for the post's removal. On the side bar I see now, that is not a rule.

Was that rule removed in the past two hours (when @she made the commend) or was that made up?

3 lowest rated comments:

Pro-Life Libertarians submitted by Lootaluck to EnoughLibertarians

swingvoater 2 points -1 points (+1|-2) ago

Yeah they're consistent, we believe in freedom right up to the point you disagree with us, and then we want to dictate how you live.

You realize that libertarians are against murder right? So, if you want to call laws against murder 'dictating how you live', then I guess I'll just walk away now wondering if anyone has ever looking into the rate of psychopathy among pro-abortionists.

No logically consistent Libertarian could possibly be pro-life

Except for those that are against murder.

For the record, when would you consider killing a genetically 'human' creature murder? To make it easier for you mentally, maybe pick one of the following;

  • a month after a live birth

  • a day after a live birth

  • at birth

  • day before due date

  • a week before due date

  • a month before due date

  • 3 months before due date

  • six months before due date

  • 8 months before due date

  • first heart beat

  • first brain activity

  • first response to pain

  • first response to mother's voice

  • first response to father's voice

  • Any time as long as it safes the mother from bad feels

To be honest, I don't expect you to have an answer. Considering issues other than bad feels is probably not your strong point.

you're just a republican whos embarrassed about it

heh. right. "screeeeeeech! I get to define what libertarians think, so if you call yourself a libertarian you have to think what I say you think! screeeeeeeeee"

Pro-Life Libertarians submitted by Lootaluck to EnoughLibertarians

swingvoater 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago

You're confused its libertarian support that drops off as people mature, as frankly its a ridiculous ideology with little support

I'll acknowledge that a fair number of libertarians start to develop some statist tendencies as they get older. But, truly, socialism is the mental playground of frauds, children, idiots and takers.

its your opinion, which you wish to force on people, I leave them free to make their own decisions regarding abortion

Even if those 'opinions' are arbitrary and unscientific. I've asked it elsewhere, what is your 'opinion' (as arbitrary as it will be) that you would call it murder for a mother to kill her child. As I also mentioned elsewhere, I don't expect you to have an answer. Just feels.

Or provide them with you know support which libertarians refuse to do unless they can make people beg them for charity

But why bother. Progressives and pro-abortionists assure us that abortion cures these ills and is perfectly ethical. What I'm asking you is to set a line after which this culling would be murder.

Pro-Life Libertarians submitted by Lootaluck to EnoughLibertarians

swingvoater 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago

my argument is that women can determine what the science says

Awesome. What about Jews and black people? Science can show clear genetic differences between various races. And yet, it can't do the same for the difference between a 6 month featus and a 60 year old adult.

Based on your criteria, the Nazis and the Southron slave owners actually had more of an argument for saying that the Jews and black people were not 'human'.

Back to the original premise, this is exactly what I meant about pro-abortionist liberals and progressives having no consistency. 'Right' is literally what ever feels right. Good feels vs bad feels.

Morality, reduced to emoticons.

legal up until the viabilty of the fetus without the mothers body providing support, except in cases where the pregnancy endangers the womans life

... except where the mother's feels are bad right? Or are you saying that if a mother aborted a 7 month featus (100% viable) because it was the product of rape, that she should be sent to jail for murder?

You cruel, heartless misogynistic bastard. (edit: sorry, I forgot to add 'screeeeeeeeeech...stop the war on women!.....screeeeeeech')

Actually, you didn't mean that did you? because that would require consistency. Which you cannot grasp. As a liberal progressive pro-abortionist.

edit: I bet you can't understand why SJW's are all progressive liberals can you?