This user has mostly submitted to the following subverses (showing top 5):
4 submissions to news
2 submissions to GreatAwakening
2 submissions to pizzagate
2 submissions to politics
2 submissions to whatever
This user has so far shared a total of 14 links, started a total of 8 discussions and submitted a total of 3071 comments.
Submissions: This user has upvoted 756 and downvoted 33 submissions.
Comments: This user has upvoted 1770 and downvoted 146 comments.
5 highest rated submissions:
Anti-LGBT politician resigns after being 'caught having sex with man in his office', submitted: 4/23/2019 3:24:42 AM, 28 points (+28|-0)
Preferably Caucasian, submitted: 4/29/2019 11:02:04 PM, 12 points (+13|-1)
Electric Six - Gay Bar (Nuclear War), submitted: 3/29/2019 1:48:32 AM, 9 points (+9|-0)
Civics Strike?, submitted: 4/29/2017 3:57:47 AM, 7 points (+7|-0)
Washington State to become First... to allow composting the People, submitted: 4/22/2019 4:06:33 PM, 6 points (+6|-0)
5 lowest rated submissions:
AMTV Truth about Pizzagate, submitted: 12/7/2016 6:53:34 AM, 1 points (+1|-0)
Peace Sells... But Who's Buying?, submitted: 5/5/2017 4:57:10 PM, 1 points (+1|-0)
Megadeth - Mechanix, submitted: 5/6/2017 6:35:18 PM, 1 points (+1|-0)
T-Shirts / Merchandise for Podesta E-Mails, submitted: 12/8/2016 3:23:50 AM, 2 points (+2|-0)
Canadian Quarters, submitted: 1/24/2019 10:18:49 PM, 2 points (+2|-0)
3 highest rated comments:
sinclair 0 points 68 points 68 points (+68|-0) ago
We'd be colonizing other planets by now.
sinclair 1 points 57 points 58 points (+58|-1) ago
It's so you have to replace the whole unit, instead of just the battery. Phones run over $200 these days, batteries are $40. It's part of the Right to Repair that Apple keeps fighting via DMCA. Basically, they want to keep stealing your money through planned obsolescence, which is becoming harder. They're scammers with little value now.
3 lowest rated comments:
sinclair 10 points -10 points 0 points (+0|-10) ago
I'm giving you a point cause. lel
sinclair 10 points -7 points 3 points (+3|-10) ago
I think people question the motivation for the stated fact. See, the dialog gets created in your head from reading the fact. As in, "why is the fact they are muslim, never mind immigrants for now, relevant to them killing Americans?" What dialog are they trying to create? Is it a random conversation starter? Is it to build a negative sentiment toward muslims, or immigrants, or both? These are questions people ask themselves when reading facts. Probably a lot more questions too. They could have just as easily stated the fact by itself, "2977 Americans were killed on 9/11." If you're not seeing why some are upset by this, then I don't think you're seeking to understand how language can influence dialog and sentiment. And that is your right of course.