Profile overview for seeker.
Submission statistics

This user made no submissions.

This user has so far shared a total of 0 links, started a total of 0 discussions and submitted a total of 88 comments.

Voting habits

Submissions: This user has upvoted 5060 and downvoted 16 submissions.

Comments: This user has upvoted 3415 and downvoted 4 comments.

Submission ratings

5 highest rated submissions:

This user made no submissions.

5 lowest rated submissions:

This user made no submissions.

Comment ratings

3 highest rated comments:

Degeneracy submitted by fluxusp to funny

seeker 0 points 29 points (+29|-0) ago

Image warping to get around meme AI?

Study Says Watching the Kardashians Actually Makes You a Worse Person submitted by Kannibal to science

seeker 0 points 19 points (+19|-0) ago

Title is sensationalized. The actual finding was pro- vs. anti-welfare attitudes. Seeing pictures of glamorous celebrities and riches reduced welfare sympathy. As it should be. Everyone should work hard and build their lives as best they can, and no-one is entitled to anything for free.

I do declare poor people are too stupid to own guns - That leftist superiority complex submitted by 7e62ce85 to emergencynation

seeker 0 points 15 points (+15|-0) ago

don't possess things that people might want to steal

Not heard of murder or rape?

3 lowest rated comments:

Isn't .NET a weird choice? submitted by votes to programming

seeker 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago

There are options other than EntityFramework. At my work we use the micro-ORM Dapper with MySQL and love it (Dapper that is.... not mysql) https://github.com/StackExchange/dapper-dot-net

My Robot C Program Which Opens and Closes Blinds Automatically Depending on Light Intensity submitted by SolidBrowser to programming

seeker 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago

Very interesting, I haven't come across Robot C before. What hardware is it running on?

Fukushima has broken the ocean [x-post from 'there'] submitted by lakdaddy to Conspiracy

seeker 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago

I think that's the point the other poster is making. If the waste is radioactive it means there's still energy left that can be harvested. The newer plant designs don't generate depleted uranium. That's a by-product of plants designed in the 50's and 60's and built in the 70's.

To be honest I'm not sure if there is much a choice. Wind/hydro can't supply close to the energy needs we need by themselves. Solar is a natural choice but producing a solar panel is not clean at all. It requires a lot of energy, rare earth minerals, and produces a lot of waste, as the poster mentioned. Adoption of newer/clean nuclear plant would be a big step forward.

From this link:

This means that a solar powered world produces 63,000 times the waste of a nuclear powered world.
http://www.thingsworsethannuclearpower.com/2012/09/the-real-waste-problem-solar-edition.html