Profile overview for Reow.
Submission statistics

This user has mostly submitted to the following subverses (showing top 5):

73 submissions to AskVoat

38 submissions to WhereAmI

10 submissions to ideasforvoat

6 submissions to ProtectVoat

6 submissions to SoapboxBanhammer

This user has so far shared a total of 51 links, started a total of 110 discussions and submitted a total of 2713 comments.

Voting habits

Submissions: This user has upvoted 1098 and downvoted 251 submissions.

Comments: This user has upvoted 4248 and downvoted 963 comments.

Submission ratings

5 highest rated submissions:

So @HomerSimpson, @TiggleBitties and co, are spamming their new sub in /v/AskVoat. I've started removing the spam and they will likely be whining about censorship in a minute., submitted: 9/29/2015 5:00:06 PM, 105 points (+121|-16)

[Meta] Transfer of AskVoat complete, submitted: 9/8/2015 2:04:03 AM, 48 points (+57|-9)

[Meta] Motion: Ban all MH101 spammers past and future who have posted their spam in AskVoat, submitted: 9/10/2015 10:04:14 PM, 48 points (+56|-8)

Requesting AskVoat for Reow, submitted: 9/6/2015 7:45:07 PM, 40 points (+47|-7)

Requesting transfer of /v/AskVoat to @system, submitted: 9/24/2015 4:22:28 AM, 38 points (+40|-2)

5 lowest rated submissions:

Comment ratings

3 highest rated comments:

deleted by user submitted by ImAGrillBTW to AskVoat

Reow 1 points 38 points (+39|-1) ago

That people who can't afford children, shouldn't have them. Why is it fair that someone else has to sacrifice to foot the bill?

deleted by user submitted by dolphonebubleine to AskVoat

Reow 1 points 37 points (+38|-1) ago

It comes from the concept of canon law - the laws and regulations prescribed by an ecclesiastical (church) authority. The word derives from the Greek kanon meaning "any straight rod or bar; rule; standard of excellence".

The word cannon on the other hand derives from the Latin canna meaning a reed or tube. Both words likely come from the Assyrian qanu meaning tube or reed.

So @HomerSimpson, @TiggleBitties and co, are spamming their new sub in /v/AskVoat. I've started removing the spam and they will likely be whining about censorship in a minute. submitted by Reow to ProtectVoat

Reow 6 points 36 points (+42|-6) ago

The only assumption you made that I would question is that he grew up.

3 lowest rated comments:

Account Deleted By User submitted by Stoneman to AskVoat

Reow 14 points -10 points (+4|-14) ago

They can't edit their title yet, unfortunately, so they couldn't take action even if they wanted to. Hitting it early allows them to repost quickly if they choose. The message is in thread for transparency.

Not justifying the rule, just explaining why it's being enforced the way it is.

Some interesting Askvoat changes, the question mark rule is back. submitted by PiercingAjarDolphin to ProtectVoat

Reow 9 points -8 points (+1|-9) ago

Yes, I shitposted here. I called my own post out as a shitpost. There's a difference between taking the piss out of something and lying about it. I take the piss out of everything - if you look through my AskVoat comments you'll see shitposts there too. If you look through my IdeasForVoat posts, you'll see shitposts there too. In fact, you'll see shitposts everywhere because I don't have to be serious 100% of the time. Ask @kevdude - I constantly take the piss out of him, and at the same time I have deep discussions with him. It's just who I am. If you don't want to trust me, then don't. Observe the account and see what happens. Maybe I'm wrong - I'm not omniscient, I can't tell what the head mods will do with it in 6 month's time. All I can say is how I see it right now.

Some interesting Askvoat changes, the question mark rule is back. submitted by PiercingAjarDolphin to ProtectVoat

Reow 8 points -6 points (+2|-8) ago

This really reeks of bullshit.

Dude, I'm here speaking publicly, so relax. From what any of us mods know, the goal of the account was a consistent public face for the sub. I.e. no matter who is posting, if it's an official message from the team, it goes through the one account. Mods come and go, rather than have users uncertain whether news etc. is official, it's easier to have one account through which it all flows. Again, to be clear, we can all still post our opinions, answer questions in sub or meta sub, etc., but the announcements/news comes through the face account. If you've worked in a corporate environment before, this really isn't that unusual - the CEO or their secretary doesn't send out a bulletin/newsletter as themselves, they use a dedicated account for it. When the block-user feature comes along, you'll all be able to block @she and still read our shitty news letter :-P