Profile overview for ragingtampon.
Submission statistics

This user has mostly submitted to the following subverses (showing top 5):

1 submissions to AskVoat

This user has so far shared a total of 0 links, started a total of 1 discussions and submitted a total of 128 comments.

Voting habits

Submissions: This user has upvoted 22 and downvoted 8 submissions.

Comments: This user has upvoted 106 and downvoted 41 comments.

Submission ratings

5 highest rated submissions:

What are some good subverses for women?, submitted: 8/6/2015 8:13:20 PM, 7 points (+13|-6)

5 lowest rated submissions:

What are some good subverses for women?, submitted: 8/6/2015 8:13:20 PM, 7 points (+13|-6)

Comment ratings

3 highest rated comments:

Warlizard calls out /u/spez on SRS hypocrisy, 4603 points 16 gilds and no response from the admins. submitted by go1dfish to MeanwhileOnReddit

ragingtampon 0 points 18 points (+18|-0) ago

I don't see why the Admins would gild his post since it was critical of SRS and Reddit.

Voaters who are into women, would you date a woman who refused to shave her armpits? submitted by mamwad to AskVoat

ragingtampon 5 points 13 points (+18|-5) ago

Except that cultural norms change all the time. At one poit it was a norm for men to wear giant powdered wigs. My point is that norms change. Also, not shaving your pits is not unhygienic unless you consider all men to be unhygienic? I also wouldn't even consider it lazy, since again, men don't shave either. Are men lazy? Women didn't shave anything for thousands of years too, it's not like shaving is "normal" biologically.

Obviously Im not going to shame you for your preferences but you shouldn't shame women for something that is natural.

Voaters who are into women, would you date a woman who refused to shave her armpits? submitted by mamwad to AskVoat

ragingtampon 2 points 11 points (+13|-2) ago

As a bi girl, I don't mind at all. I mean, I don't mind it on guys. Granted i've only had one "friend" who didn't shave her pits but looking at the pics it doesn't make them less attractive to me. Just like I don't care if a guy has back hair, even though it's suppose to be "repulsive".

3 lowest rated comments:

/u/spez dodges answering why SRS subreddit will not be banned submitted by BlurryScreen to MeanwhileOnReddit

ragingtampon 2 points -2 points (+0|-2) ago

SRS does not post anything that has less than 20 upvotes so it wouldn't silence anything.

/u/spez dodges answering why SRS subreddit will not be banned submitted by BlurryScreen to MeanwhileOnReddit

ragingtampon 3 points -2 points (+1|-3) ago

Well then every meta sub would have to be banned. My point is not to defend SRS but that when people complain about SRS to the admins, the admins know they don't actually brigade so people come off like theyre talking out of their ass. Now, if you wanted to be legit, you'd bring up best of, SRD, KIA. All those subs have legit brigade documentation.

Edit: I didn't downvote you. I don't have to points to downvote people.

White supremacists are a really tiny minority in this country. Shouldn't that tiny minority be protected from lynch mobs, though? ..or do you think they should all be baked in an oven? submitted by 8_billion_eaters to AskVoat

ragingtampon 2 points -2 points (+0|-2) ago

I mean it wasn't that long ago that they were lynching people right? Like, you still have to keep an eye on people who want to eliminate (kill) people based on skin colour. Can you actively entice violence in the states? Like, freely advocate to say, kill all black babies? Is that legal?