Profile overview for pornusername.
Submission statistics

This user made no submissions.

This user has so far shared a total of 0 links, started a total of 0 discussions and submitted a total of 42 comments.

Voting habits

Submissions: This user has upvoted 27 and downvoted 0 submissions.

Comments: This user has upvoted 11 and downvoted 0 comments.

Submission ratings

5 highest rated submissions:

This user made no submissions.

5 lowest rated submissions:

This user made no submissions.

Comment ratings

3 highest rated comments:

Now congressmen are complaining they can't protect themselves because of strict gun laws in DC submitted by stillinit to politics

pornusername 0 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago

Please please please no two classes of citizens. We already have that with cops in areas you can't get guns. Government should not be allowed to grant additional rights based on employment, elected status, or race.

A friend relayed a theory that I can't shake: He claimed that Google is no longer a search engine; its instead an advanced AI that tries to influence you by restricting your access to information submitted by Diogenes_The_Cynic to whatever

pornusername 0 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago

Learn how to use the net

Has a button called enter this site, when you thought you were already on the site.

3 lowest rated comments:

This is what product placements look like on Hawaii 5-0. Kill me. submitted by quizzicalpepperoni to whatever

pornusername 3 points -3 points (+0|-3) ago


Account Deleted By User submitted by RussianIvantheCrazy to AskVoat

pornusername 4 points -1 points (+3|-4) ago

Yeah, seriously. Sharia Law isn't law in the US so what are you banning. I know there are a few cases where people agree to have arbitration based on sharia law but as long as they aren't forced into it is whatever.

I personally would gladly agree to the requirement to use a particular civil system if the other person had also pre-agreed to the same system, if that system were better than our current mess (I'm not saying sharia is, but that it would be easy to create a better civil system).

Account Deleted By User submitted by RussianIvantheCrazy to AskVoat

pornusername 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago

I guess there is a case where sharia may be relevent which you could ban out of relevance is with implied contracts based on past behavior. There are lots of implied contracts and judges have to litigate them. A custom between two people could become relevent to the implied contract. You could form an injunction specifically against sharia customs being considered.