This user has mostly submitted to the following subverses (showing top 5):
8 submissions to AskVoat
6 submissions to politics
5 submissions to ideasforvoat
3 submissions to whatever
1 submissions to bitcoin
This user has so far shared a total of 11 links, started a total of 17 discussions and submitted a total of 4733 comments.
Submissions: This user has upvoted 8675 and downvoted 612 submissions.
Comments: This user has upvoted 9313 and downvoted 2083 comments.
5 highest rated submissions:
Today is the 3rd year anniversary of Arron Swartz's death. He was a co-founder of reddit, but would have left with us to voat., submitted: 1/11/2016 3:42:04 PM, 212 points (+218|-6)
Smug Jon Stewart to Republicans: "You are in the minority, it's supposed to taste like a shit sandwich", submitted: 11/10/2016 3:59:32 PM, 99 points (+101|-2)
Voat should declare that shared mod accounts to provide anonymity will not be tolerated. This was a problem on similar sites, and would fit in well with the moderation logs., submitted: 6/29/2015 5:20:47 AM, 72 points (+74|-2)
I have a theory about why all the non-rational people are throwing tantrums and are scared right now; the jig is up for their behavior., submitted: 11/11/2016 8:40:29 PM, 48 points (+49|-1)
Senator Rand Paul (R-KY) on NSA Surveillance Live Feed, submitted: 5/20/2015 8:49:05 PM, 24 points (+24|-0)
5 lowest rated submissions:
Current front page sticky is acting funny., submitted: 5/21/2015 10:04:21 PM, 1 points (+1|-0)
4USXUS.com could be a great tool for people in the US who follow politics and want to make a change, but it is largely underutilized. Please at least check it out., submitted: 8/7/2015 4:36:32 PM, 1 points (+1|-0)
Something like reddit's "other discussions"., submitted: 10/10/2015 6:50:20 AM, 2 points (+2|-0)
Eight of Iran's women's football team 'are men', submitted: 7/7/2016 1:37:21 PM, 2 points (+3|-1)
Having trouble finding victim/offender race statistics for rape, submitted: 12/4/2017 5:29:23 PM, 2 points (+2|-0)
3 highest rated comments:
peacegnome 0 points 121 points 121 points (+121|-0) ago
They are doing their job perfectly, we just saw a shining example.
peacegnome 4 points 108 points 112 points (+112|-4) ago
If they want to have a discussion then that's great, if they want to rule and argue the best way to censor content then they can GTFO. they come here and try to shut down discussions using their old shitty ways "you are racist", and that shit doesn't work here.
peacegnome 0 points 86 points 86 points (+86|-0) ago
Why do SJWs fake anti-SJW crimes? Why do jews fake anti-jewish crimes? why do the blacklivesmatter people fake anti-black crimes?
Their whole identity and where they fit in in the world revolves around being oppressed, if they wern't oppressed then they would be just like any other group in the world, like the quakers. You never hear about a quaker painting a quaker-star with a line through it on their door, or something like that.
3 lowest rated comments:
Trump backers, some with guns, gather for first big rally submitted by Boukert to news
peacegnome 8 points -8 points 0 points (+0|-8) ago
why wear all that armor, and look like something out of a video game, when nothing has happened yet? I mean, i could understand if there were riots or something, but most likely they are there to simply "be present" and keep people from doing stupid shit. If a trump or black power person showed up dressed like that i would assume there would be issues.
peacegnome 12 points -7 points 5 points (+5|-12) ago
librarians are huge SJWs.
peacegnome 7 points -5 points 2 points (+2|-7) ago
go1dfish should always be listened to, and should always be given the benefit of the doubt.
I have also suggested a version of this in the past, but because of the development requirements i never asked in IFV before. In my version you would select which moderators curated your content. For example, you could have the spam bot turned on or off, all the way up to someone who only allows rated G content. My plan would also mean that anyone could be a moderator of any subs, and it would be up to them to get people to use your moderation. There could be stats like correlation, popularity, etc. for the mods.
Anyway, he has all the best intentions, and as long as any censorship that is there, but removable (think google's safe search), I don't think that it is really a problem.