This user has mostly submitted to the following subverses (showing top 5):
5 submissions to pics
3 submissions to politics
3 submissions to bestof
2 submissions to subverserequest
1 submissions to voatdev
This user has so far shared a total of 11 links, started a total of 13 discussions and submitted a total of 631 comments.
Submissions: This user has upvoted 948 and downvoted 123 submissions.
Comments: This user has upvoted 830 and downvoted 401 comments.
5 highest rated submissions:
/v/GoatsForHire - By popular demand, a place where voaters can offer services/look for whatever needs they may have!, submitted: 6/21/2015 3:28:24 AM, 40 points (+40|-0)
/v/politics - Survey, submitted: 7/9/2015 12:41:00 AM, 34 points (+34|-0)
Regarding NSFW submissions, submitted: 7/11/2015 10:16:00 PM, 32 points (+32|-0)
Feel free to host an AMA - anyone is welcome!, submitted: 6/25/2015 7:17:42 AM, 23 points (+23|-0)
[Meta] /v/politics finally surpassed /v/fatpeoplehate in size..., submitted: 7/15/2015 11:44:04 PM, 21 points (+23|-2)
5 lowest rated submissions:
Requesting /v/todayilearned - Only mod completely inactive for over 4 months, submitted: 6/27/2015 12:51:03 PM, 1 points (+1|-0)
Request /v/pics - only moderator inactive 3 months., submitted: 7/6/2015 11:02:56 AM, 1 points (+1|-0)
Mod distinguish is broken, submitted: 7/22/2015 8:51:29 PM, 2 points (+2|-0)
Where can I watch tonight's GOP debate?, submitted: 8/7/2015 5:51:07 AM, 2 points (+2|-0)
Why moe why?, submitted: 8/10/2015 8:59:24 AM, 2 points (+2|-0)
3 highest rated comments:
oaken 1 points 56 points 57 points (+57|-1) ago
despite popular belief, Voat is still not a corporation
What? Then what does this, titled 1 month ago called "Voat, the student side-project is now Voat, Inc.!" mean? Obviously it will be a "popular belief" if you make a huge stickey'd announcement about it...
oaken 1 points 39 points 40 points (+40|-1) ago
I appreciate the concern, and I agree that things like this should be paid attention to. To be honest, I'm not sure why I mod so many big subverses, it just sort of happened. I applied to /v/politics about a week ago because I'm on that sub 24/7 and read almost all the links that get posted there anyways, so I thought it might make sense to apply. I also did/am doing the CSS for many of these subs, and is a part of the reason I was invited initially. As for the others, I am friends with the mods there and they happened to invite me to help out. An example of this is /v/iama, where @Clayton reached out to me and asked me to help out.
I have taken almost no mod actions on all of these subs, and plan to keep them open and free. I modded absolutely nothing on reddit and rarely commented. If people are concerned about me being a "power mod", I will happily step down on some of these subverses, but I would like to think I am doing a good job so far.
3 lowest rated comments:
oaken 19 points -9 points 10 points (+10|-19) ago
oaken 8 points -6 points 2 points (+2|-8) ago
Loads and loads of subverses use "meta" subs to host discussions. Not everyone is interested in meta discussions. Some subs have enough of these discussions that it would clump up the page otherwise. Moving discussions to a different place for more focussed dialogue is not censorship, has never been complained about before, and is a well accepted practice.
oaken 3 points -2 points 1 points (+1|-3) ago
You're misrepresenting the facts, it's not like she's removing threads just for "lack of punctuation", as if threads are getting deleted when users forget an apostrophe somewhere.
She's removing threads that violate the very first rule on the subverse, which is clearly stated as the first item on the sidebar. Whether or not you agree with the rule, the entire mod team, not just @she agreed upon it, and actively enforce it. If there is a problem with the rule, start a discussion on /v/modsofaskvoat, rather than witchhunting and blaming /u/she for everything.