This user has mostly submitted to the following subverses (showing top 5):
177 submissions to pizzagate
83 submissions to GreatAwakening
16 submissions to PizzagateMemes
3 submissions to pizzagatemods
3 submissions to pizzagatewhatever
This user has so far shared a total of 94 links, started a total of 191 discussions and submitted a total of 2913 comments.
Submissions: This user has upvoted 995 and downvoted 36 submissions.
Comments: This user has upvoted 1144 and downvoted 157 comments.
5 highest rated submissions:
Paypal backs down on Seaman due to overwhelming public opprobrium, submitted: 1/2/2017 8:08:38 PM, 226 points (+234|-8)
Why would Donna Brazile be scared for her life after Seth Rich was murdered if the murder was just a "botched robbery"?, submitted: 11/4/2017 11:24:21 PM, 202 points (+204|-2)
Robert De Niro was questioned by police in 1998 as client to underage prostitution ring, submitted: 6/12/2018 8:52:06 PM, 201 points (+202|-1)
Signed Order: Pelosi/Schumer/Schiff/Warner 'warn' intel agencies to ignore presidential order on declassification, submitted: 9/19/2018 4:28:42 AM, 189 points (+189|-0)
breaking: Wikileaks co-founder found dead - 'suicided' (not Assange, 2nd hand man James Dolan), submitted: 1/14/2018 12:18:14 PM, 183 points (+187|-4)
5 lowest rated submissions:
Debunking Obama's $65k pizza / hotdog email, submitted: 4/1/2018 4:07:10 AM, -10 points (+2|-12)
Kennedy didnt die in 2000 - and is posting .... as Q !!! (speculation), submitted: 4/8/2018 11:50:47 PM, -2 points (+4|-6)
Oh no she di-ent! Sarah Sanders wears an 'Ask me about Q' shirt to press gathering, submitted: 6/30/2018 12:59:06 AM, -1 points (+11|-12)
The ego complex of conspiracy investigators, submitted: 12/14/2016 10:22:12 AM, -1 points (+3|-4)
scumbag steve, submitted: 12/8/2016 2:13:57 AM, 0 points (+2|-2)
3 highest rated comments:
MolochHunter 0 points 90 points 90 points (+90|-0) ago
OK everyone, take stock of the implications of this incident.
James Alefantis is monitoring the comments on this website. THIS IS WELCOMED. It means when we post shit that is potentially damaging to him and his associates, we will be MORE MINDFUL of making arbitrary and ambit claims of his guilt/innocence.
The hardest evidence we have so far shows that Mr Alefantis has a distasteful sense of finding humour in sexualising even infants. While this may well be indicative of worse - and we well know the satanic ritual abuse is prevalent and growing from associated cases/busts, our communities evidence is not 100% conclusive of having caught Mr Alefantis in the actual act of pedophilia.
Mr Alefantis, if you are reading this, the reason the world is investigating is because the authorities and media wont. You well know this will continue to be the case unless you MAKE A CASE to the public. Discuss your dark humour, if that's all it is, address the more salient evidence that the media refuses to countenance.
If you are covering for a crime that is lesser than child abuse, this is your opportunity to go to the FBI and turn yourself in. I know, that's naive, you may well be implicated in crimes of men far more powerful than your average FBI agent.
But the SPECULATION from your and Podesta's silence - and the disinclination of media/law enforcement to take the concern AWAY from the citizens, is the cause of collateral damage and unfounded/unfair allegations to others. So stop playing games (no Megyn Kelly is not transparency) and help us all bring this to a resolution.
MolochHunter 2 points 79 points 81 points (+81|-2) ago
All you guys dissing on David Seaman, fuck me. Save your ammunition for the real enemy. Stick the fuck together until we destroy the pedo mafia, haven't you useless cunts heard of divide and conquer?
3 lowest rated comments:
MolochHunter 8 points -6 points 2 points (+2|-8) ago
you're asking for a conversation that was had, done and over months ago
Q proved and re-proved he is on the very innermost ring of Trump's confidantes
I'm not lifting a finger to convince you, its all there in the Q posts , repeatedly, or in the Q proofs link on the side
if you think there's a flaw with the Q proofs, how about you make a post of it explaining why and we'll test the mettle of your hypothesis
this is Great Awakening. It is not a 'is Q real?' sub. It is a 'we support Q' sub
MolochHunter 8 points -5 points 3 points (+3|-8) ago
then you need to fuck off and do a shit load of research before you can return to this forum pretending you have anything of value to offer