Profile overview for Icy-Defiance.
Submission statistics

This user has mostly submitted to the following subverses (showing top 5):

11 submissions to veuwer

2 submissions to whatever

1 submissions to AskVoat

1 submissions to BaphoNet

1 submissions to ideasforvoat

This user has so far shared a total of 0 links, started a total of 17 discussions and submitted a total of 608 comments.

Voting habits

Submissions: This user has upvoted 750 and downvoted 326 submissions.

Comments: This user has upvoted 1366 and downvoted 533 comments.

Submission ratings

5 highest rated submissions:

I made an image host! http://www.veuwer.com/, submitted: 5/24/2015 1:00:50 AM, 187 points (+188|-1)

[META] Just because someone disagrees with you does not mean he is a shill or SJW, submitted: 6/19/2015 10:50:26 PM, 159 points (+170|-11)

On the IRC "cabal", /v/askvoat, /v/seriousdiscussion, and witch hunting, from an admin of that IRC, submitted: 8/15/2015 10:12:55 PM, 30 points (+54|-24)

Veuwer's max file size increased to 10 MB, submitted: 6/14/2015 10:23:59 PM, 23 points (+23|-0)

Has anyone else noticed that none of the posts critical of she have been deleted, except for the ones that don't contain question marks?, submitted: 8/12/2015 1:39:49 AM, 21 points (+50|-29)

5 lowest rated submissions:

Transferring images to S3, submitted: 6/3/2015 6:04:53 PM, 5 points (+5|-0)

Veuwer moved to a new host, upload temporarily disabled, submitted: 6/12/2015 11:48:45 PM, 5 points (+5|-0)

Veuwer 0.3 - URL uploads, some quality of life improvements, submitted: 5/28/2015 7:31:38 PM, 9 points (+9|-0)

Veuwer is down - 7/13/2015, submitted: 7/13/2015 5:23:11 PM, 10 points (+10|-0)

A collaborative statement to the Voat community, by @Icy-Defiance and @ElectroLumus, submitted: 8/18/2015 1:46:58 AM, 11 points (+27|-16)

Comment ratings

3 highest rated comments:

Regarding questionable content submitted by Atko to announcements

Icy-Defiance 21 points 536 points (+557|-21) ago

Perplexed as to why we came over if this is going to be the case.

I came over to escape politically motivated censorship, which this most certainly isn't. I defended the existence of /v/jailbait, but if Atko thinks it's threatening to Voat's existence, then whatever. He's not trying to control conversation or anything, so personally I'm still cool with it.

I say it's a shame, but not a big deal, and I'm not going to leave because of this.

Regarding questionable content submitted by Atko to announcements

Icy-Defiance 5 points 92 points (+97|-5) ago

Jailbait is in a legal gray area. FPH isn't even close. Can't say they're comparable.

Not that I care about FPH getting banned either. I don't think it should have been banned, but I was here long before that happened and would stay here if Atko banned FPH too, as long as he's transparent about it.

I'm here because of reddit's silent attempts to control discussion. The dishonest, shady shit that people don't want to believe is happening even after they're shown a dozen examples. That's the kind of thing I don't want Atko to do.

So we have /v/doxxing. Time to come up with the rules. submitted by chmod to AskVoat

Icy-Defiance 4 points 40 points (+44|-4) ago

Doxxing is the single worst thing a person can do on the internet. Violent threats, harassment, even posting child porn? That's all bad, but they don't directly kill anyone. Doxxing does. If this website bans just one thing that the law hasn't, this should be it.

That said, I'm not completely...

3 lowest rated comments:

On the IRC "cabal", /v/askvoat, /v/seriousdiscussion, and witch hunting, from an admin of that IRC submitted by Icy-Defiance to whatever

Icy-Defiance 23 points -18 points (+5|-23) ago

Lol SomeScientologist is opposed to your witch hunt, as far as I'm aware. He also hangs out in IRC with us. That example works against you.

She is also deleting with the question mark shit, again not a rule.

Yep, you didn't read my post either. Though just to be clear, it was a rule, just worded horribly. It said question "?" when she meant question mark. I can't defend her for either the wording or actually enforcing it, which I made clear in my post.

I made this post to actually talk with people rationally and clear things up, not to deal with the mindless accusations of people who are entirely incapable of reading.

Do you think you own the place?

Yeah...that's not relevant to anything here.

deleted by user submitted by Shiny to AskVoat

Icy-Defiance 24 points -16 points (+8|-24) ago

If you see something you think is illegal, report it to the proper authorities. Otherwise, don't censor things.

She reports something she thinks is illegal. (And may be, considering laws often talk about sexualized minors, and not actually clothing. None of us are lawyers though.)

HOW DARE YOU DO THAT YOU EVIL SJW! YOU MUST BE CENSORED!

deleted by user submitted by Shiny to AskVoat

Icy-Defiance 10 points -9 points (+1|-10) ago

Lol you didn't see /v/jailbait before it got banned. They weren't clothed. Reacting that way to any replacements is entirely understandable.