This user has mostly submitted to the following subverses (showing top 5):
20 submissions to news
5 submissions to whatever
2 submissions to AskVoat
2 submissions to subverserequest
1 submissions to nsfw
This user has so far shared a total of 25 links, started a total of 8 discussions and submitted a total of 388 comments.
Submissions: This user has upvoted 4070 and downvoted 273 submissions.
Comments: This user has upvoted 1850 and downvoted 853 comments.
5 highest rated submissions:
North Georgia newspaper publisher jailed over open records request, submitted: 7/3/2016 12:03:51 PM, 166 points (+166|-0)
Weed smell not sufficient reason for car search, Colorado court rules, submitted: 7/17/2017 2:31:51 PM, 136 points (+140|-4)
13-Year-Old Rape Charge Against Trump Has Been Dropped, submitted: 11/5/2016 11:13:12 AM, 120 points (+121|-1)
Black privilege is not having your face plastered all over the news when you murder police., submitted: 10/9/2016 11:14:44 AM, 107 points (+113|-6)
Federal judge blocks California's high-capacity magazine ban, submitted: 6/30/2017 10:38:33 AM, 89 points (+90|-1)
5 lowest rated submissions:
Is there any way to block links to YouTube from appearing?, submitted: 7/7/2017 9:53:54 PM, -2 points (+2|-4)
Requesting /v/ketogains - mod made on post then nothing in 1+ year, submitted: 7/13/2015 2:17:18 AM, 1 points (+1|-0)
Tonight's Dessert: Dark Chocolate Iced Cream, submitted: 7/15/2015 2:03:52 AM, 1 points (+1|-0)
Ever wonder how the isolation cells in Kuwait were set up?, submitted: 10/18/2016 8:43:01 PM, 1 points (+2|-1)
Despite exposés and embarrassments, hundreds of judges preside in New York without law degrees, submitted: 6/28/2017 2:25:37 PM, 1 points (+1|-0)
3 highest rated comments:
hungry_mungry 9 points 62 points 71 points (+71|-9) ago
I'm happy to upvoat all you new fuckers. Been off reddit for over a year, it's nicer over here. Enjoy your stay.
hungry_mungry 2 points 41 points 43 points (+43|-2) ago
"Come here illegally a second time and we'll give you free food, shelter, and medical care. And you can even visit your old gang homies while you're here!"
hungry_mungry 3 points 33 points 36 points (+36|-3) ago
Nothing in your link explains why it's actually claimed to be false.
“That notion was proposed by a few individuals who are unfamiliar with how and why USASOC conducts training exercises,” he said in an email. “This exercise is routine training to maintain a high level of readiness for Army Special Operations Forces because they must be ready to support potential missions anywhere in the world on a moment’s notice.” He said the only thing unique about this particular exercise, which is slated to take place between July 15 and Sept. 15, is “the use of new challenging terrain” which was chosen because it is similar to conditions special operations forces operate in overseas. Lastoria added that concerns were heightened due to the rumored involvement of local law enforcement agencies but noted that such interagency collaboration was necessary as operations were planned for areas “outside of military bases where civilian agencies have jurisdiction.” He also observed that his office had been receiving a lot of phone calls from people who had heard about the exercise and were concerned about “the nature of the training objectives.”
So they do this kind of thing all the time, and he says that it's really meant as training for operations overseas, but that doesn't mean that it can't be used as the kind of martial law training people are concerned about. I don't see how they can claim that the reason underlying the training is for martial law is false if they don't provide any direct evidence that it is, in fact, false. If anything, it's debatable, and clearly calling the sites which argue that it's training for martial law "conspiracy websites" shows which side of the debate they're on.
Oh, but Snopes said it's false so it must be false, right?
Edit: if you want to downvote me go ahead, but please point me to where Snopes proves this is false rather than opines?
3 lowest rated comments:
hungry_mungry 8 points -6 points 2 points (+2|-8) ago
That argument could be applied to any decision a person makes though: tattoos, dying hair, ear piercing, what clothes one wears. I agree that being fat is a drain on society's resources, but there are like 200 million fat people in the US (probably more) so I just think such sweeping generalizations aren't necessarily accurate. Also someone's weight doesn't necessarily make them a bad person - there are plenty of really nice, kind, caring fat people out there, and treating them like a circus freak merely because they are fat just devalues humanity.
hungry_mungry 5 points -4 points 1 points (+1|-5) ago
Ah "dirty blonde", another term for fucking brown. You just wish you had blonde hair because it fits with your self-proclaimed "oldfag" status. Go suck a cock, blondefag.