Profile overview for hotairmakespopcorn.
Submission statistics

This user has mostly submitted to the following subverses (showing top 5):

1 submissions to whatever

1 submissions to Hillaryforprison

This user has so far shared a total of 0 links, started a total of 2 discussions and submitted a total of 556 comments.

Voting habits

Submissions: This user has upvoted 2309 and downvoted 240 submissions.

Comments: This user has upvoted 1833 and downvoted 476 comments.

Submission ratings

5 highest rated submissions:

Consolidated List Of Hillary's Crimes?, submitted: 9/22/2016 7:48:40 PM, 9 points (+9|-0)

What's with the pedo content posts here at night?, submitted: 2/17/2017 3:04:15 PM, 1 points (+4|-3)

5 lowest rated submissions:

What's with the pedo content posts here at night?, submitted: 2/17/2017 3:04:15 PM, 1 points (+4|-3)

Consolidated List Of Hillary's Crimes?, submitted: 9/22/2016 7:48:40 PM, 9 points (+9|-0)

Comment ratings

3 highest rated comments:

Federal appeals court says assault rifles are weapons of war not protected by Second Amendment submitted by GIF-lLL-S0NG to news

hotairmakespopcorn 0 points 59 points (+59|-0) ago

Weapons of war are literally why the Second Amendment exists. The judge literally advocates the Second Amendment doesn't exist.

Can anybody explain the claim that the Immigration Ban is unconstitutional? submitted by chicken_nugget to AskVoat

hotairmakespopcorn 1 points 55 points (+56|-1) ago

Source material is always good. So let's see what the law actually says.

(f) Suspension of entry or imposition of restrictions by President

Whenever the President finds that the entry of any aliens or of any class of aliens into the United States would be detrimental to the interests of the United States, he may by proclamation, and for such period as he shall deem necessary, suspend the entry of all aliens or any class of aliens as immigrants or nonimmigrants, or impose on the entry of aliens any restrictions he may deem to be appropriate. Whenever the Attorney General finds that a commercial airline has failed to comply with regulations of the Attorney General relating to requirements of airlines for the detection of fraudulent documents used by passengers traveling to the United States (including the training of personnel in such detection), the Attorney General may suspend the entry of some or all aliens transported to the United States by such airline.

What this means is, the judge who told him to stop is in violation of US law. The President and DHS has power of law to completely ignore the judge telling Trump to stop. The judge has no standing. Not only does executive order provide legal writ to guide the executive branch on how to implement law, the law literally says Trump is entirely within the powers granted to him by the law, regardless of it being an executive order. You can't even argue this is an abuse of power. Such execution is explicitly granted by the law.

https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/8/1182

According to the US Code of Law, Trump is entirely within the law as granted by the US Congress. Period.

BLM see police "demilitarization" in Chicago, learns who's actually killing blacks submitted by Rb8623 to news

hotairmakespopcorn 2 points 35 points (+37|-2) ago

That's bullshit. Don't conflate police militarization with other training and social issues. Allowing crime to occur by not doing their job has absolutely nothing to do with "demilitarization."

Police absolutely do not need to be militarized. That must end. The federal militarization efforts make police departments beholden to federal funding and policy (frequently ignoring local politics), which is a back-door method around the US Constitution. Because of push-back here, Obama has officially gone on record in support of a massive, new, federal police force. Only idiots and tyrants support militarization of the police.

That said, police policy is broken. IQ limits are idiotic. Our training is substandard, even in comparison with defacto standards of soft Europe. Police Unions must end. Police must be trained to not escalate every situation. Brute force and arrests are not a viable, universal solution, regardless of training. The blue line is criminal racketeering. Period. Assuming you believe we are a country of laws. And if you want to adhere to the same standards of law, because of conspiracy/racketeering laws, most police are criminals, even though roughly only 10%-20% of the police force is the real criminals. But because of police unions and police criminal conspiracy, ejecting and prosecuting these people are almost impossible.

That said, most police are good guys who just want to do their job. It's hard to blame them when they've been trained incorrectly and insufficiently. Even lawyers are quick to point out police are clueless on even common issues of law. The police will tell you otherwise. Lawyers laugh. Made worse, there is a judiciary movement for police to not use their brains in any way, shape, or form (thus the IQ limits), arrest everyone, force everyone into the criminal system, and let judges preside over everyone. It's a fantastic method of control and state authoritarianism.

Additionally, none of this has anything to do with the terrorist organization known as BLM, or the horrifically broken "black culture." Which is further compounded and re-enforced by the latest incarnation of Prohibition known as the War On Drugs.

Again, there is a huge spectrum of social and legal issues involved here and "demilitarization" is not even topical in relation to BLM or "black culture." Please don't conflate and confuse and already complex minefield.

3 lowest rated comments:

In fairness to Hillary... submitted by nomenimion to politics

hotairmakespopcorn 1 points -1 points (+0|-1) ago

That's only true because of traditional gender and class roles, not because of politics.

Congress Already Looking at Tightening H-1B Immigration submitted by One-Way_Bus to politics

hotairmakespopcorn 1 points -1 points (+0|-1) ago

You say that only because you don't understand how the game is played. First of all, most H1Bs are here because US workers were fired and illegally replaced with H1Bs.

Secondly, and more harmfully, this is how it's done and how it represses wages. A company lists an opening by offering bottom dollar for a position and then they list qualififications which are impossible to meet at the price point. So for example, a $120,000 position is listed by pay is offered at $60-$80. If an American applies, they low ball the offer at $60,000. So of course, they can't fill the position. They then illegally turn to H1Bs and fill the position. This in turn sets the salary cap for a $120,000 skillset as something closer to $80,000 on average. The result is a massive fraud and savings on labor across the board. It's not actually that the skillset isn't available from Americans, but that companies don't feel they should have to pay market prices for a given skillset.

You show me a company hiring an H1B and I'll show you a company who hates Americans. You show me a tech company who hires H1Bs and I'll show you a company who is actively waging class warfare against the middle class. You show me a company who hires H1Bs and I'll show you a company who hates capitalism.

All H1Bs in this country must immediately be ejected.

Congress Already Looking at Tightening H-1B Immigration submitted by One-Way_Bus to politics

hotairmakespopcorn 1 points -1 points (+0|-1) ago

You've completely missed the boat. Purposely I suspect. Go tell your Doctor you're only going to pay half your bill. Remind him you're negotiating. Seriously, you can't be this dumb.

You're claiming capitalism is breaking the law. Again, you can't be this dumb.

Just stop it.

All H1Bs need to immedately be ejected from the country.