Profile overview for hellinacell.
Submission statistics

This user has mostly submitted to the following subverses (showing top 5):

1 submissions to science

This user has so far shared a total of 1 links, started a total of 0 discussions and submitted a total of 16 comments.

Voting habits

Submissions: This user has upvoted 2 and downvoted 0 submissions.

Comments: This user has upvoted 6 and downvoted 0 comments.

Submission ratings

5 highest rated submissions:

Reality doesn't exist until we measure it, quantum experiment confirms, submitted: 7/19/2016 2:23:27 AM, 63 points (+72|-9)

5 lowest rated submissions:

Reality doesn't exist until we measure it, quantum experiment confirms, submitted: 7/19/2016 2:23:27 AM, 63 points (+72|-9)

Comment ratings

3 highest rated comments:

Just about every influential Jew in America and Europe fights hard for multiculturalism, and yet those very same people oppose multiculturalism in Israel. Doesn't that seem weird to you? submitted by Nazibot13 to whatever

hellinacell 1 points 7 points (+8|-1) ago

Doesn't that seem weird to you?

Nah. Zionists are cruel, manipulative bastards who only care about getting what they want. What seems weird to me is that nobody in a position of authority seems keen to stop them ruining lives.

Reality doesn't exist until we measure it, quantum experiment confirms submitted by hellinacell to science

hellinacell 1 points 3 points (+4|-1) ago

This, these researchers obviously have no grasp on reality because I'm having a hard time wishing my problems away by not measuring them with a measuring tape.

They're talking about quantum reality. The universe we experience directly doesn't follow quantum law. At least, not in any way any scientist has ever been able to figure out.

Reality doesn't exist until we measure it, quantum experiment confirms submitted by hellinacell to science

hellinacell 1 points 2 points (+3|-1) ago

I think this confirms we live in a simulation.

I think this is crazy, but I'll also admit I've been thinking along exactly the same lines.

3 lowest rated comments:

Where's the call for a ban on trucks and axes liberals? submitted by elcob32 to politics

hellinacell 9 points -8 points (+1|-9) ago

Actually the recent truck incident killed far more people than most incidents involving guns.

Actually, you're clearly not of sound mind if you are arguing that it is easier to kill large groups of people with a truck than it is with almost any type of gun. Whatever you believe about guns has obviously impacted your mental health.

If my life is in danger I have the right to protect myself.

But your life wouldn't be in danger if the carjacker holding you up hadn't been able to buy a lethal weapon in Walmart. If you legalise guns you increase the danger people are put in, and hence you necessitate them feeling like they need a gun to even the odds. In other words, you are pissing in people's faces and telling them it is raining. You are creating a problem and then insisting that the solution to that problem is more of the same problem.

A lot of things can be used to kill people besides guns

You are spectacularly missing the point I so meticulously explained in the last post. You have to abuse things like rubber dildos and pencil sharpeners to use them as weapons. Guns ARE weapons. They are 100 percent designed to kill quickly and efficiently.

Your narcissism just sickens me, to be honest. You drone on about "your right to protect yourself" without once giving a thought to other people's right to protect themselves from YOU. Assholes like you simply want guns for the power it gives you. You probably aren't very smart or physically intimidating, and with a gun you ultimately can have your own way with people, even if it is wrong or selfish.

Where's the call for a ban on trucks and axes liberals? submitted by elcob32 to politics

hellinacell 7 points -6 points (+1|-7) ago

No, no this is not true.

Yes, yes it is.

I say this because of a key word you used: everybody. The only people the "right wing loonies" want to have access to firearms are law-abiding citizens who undergo training for the proper handling of such weapons.

LOL. Hilarious. Even Jeffrey Dahmer was at one point a "law-abiding citizen" as you put it. So was Ted Bundy. Shit, so was Al Capone. What you seem to be saying is that it would be fine to sell all these people weapons, provided they hadn't been convicted of any crime previously. I'm not sure I even have the words to explain how stupid what you are saying even is. If the right wing loonies only want to take guns off the "bad guys" then why the fuck do the "good guys" even need guns in the first fucking place??!!

Everything you guys say is just a complete contradiction of itself. I have come to conclude that you are of a madness usually only seen in political or religious extremists.

Where's the call for a ban on trucks and axes liberals? submitted by elcob32 to politics

hellinacell 7 points -6 points (+1|-7) ago

You can check the statistics for yourself, there are almost no incidence of gun violence by one of these "lone wolf attackers" that have killed as many as the truck in Nice France did.

The truck in Nice, France, was one single, well-planned incident, which you are bizarrely fabricating into a general rule. Truck attacks are not as common, nor do they kill as many, as gun attacks.

Again check the statistics for yourself (I know I have) most gun crimes are committed with illegally obtained weapons

Oh please, just stop with your retarded bullshit.

More than 80% of guns used in mass shootings obtained legally

http://www.msnbc.com/msnbc/most-guns-mass-shootings-obtained-legally

Stopping legal sales would not stop gun violence.

Are you fucking retarded? If you stop selling people guns then they will stop shooting each other. Stop selling them guns and take the ones which exist out of circulation like any rational civilized country would do. How can people shoot each other if they haven't got any guns you fucking moron?

If that were the case then Chicago

No, DO NOT bring up Chicago. Bring up somewhere like the UK where they are banned universally, and not just in a solitary city in the middle of a gun orgy, where residents can easily drive to Rockford or the next nearest town and buy guns.

It really is false argument after false argument with you guys. The premise on which your arguments are all based (i.e. that guns are beneficial to society) is so fundamentally fucking absurd, that it makes you sound like a complete retard whatever you say.