This user has mostly submitted to the following subverses (showing top 5):
35 submissions to whatever
27 submissions to politics
25 submissions to funny
14 submissions to news
8 submissions to videos
This user has so far shared a total of 102 links, started a total of 25 discussions and submitted a total of 749 comments.
Submissions: This user has upvoted 1812 and downvoted 111 submissions.
Comments: This user has upvoted 1428 and downvoted 314 comments.
5 highest rated submissions:
Evidence of Brigading on v/Politics and Potential Voat Exploit, submitted: 11/27/2016 3:43:21 PM, 385 points (+394|-9)
BREAKING: Trump caught red handed with Russian prostitute, submitted: 1/16/2017 6:18:24 PM, 270 points (+279|-9)
Le reddit army is here, submitted: 6/30/2016 2:14:27 AM, 263 points (+289|-26)
SPOILER ALERT, submitted: 8/22/2017 4:13:56 PM, 257 points (+261|-4)
Starbucks has gone too far this Christmas!, submitted: 11/30/2016 11:01:58 PM, 248 points (+254|-6)
5 lowest rated submissions:
Why Conservatives Opt for Propaganda Over Reality, submitted: 11/27/2016 8:24:47 AM, -14 points (+4|-18)
Breitbart News Worst Headlines, submitted: 11/27/2016 12:30:38 PM, -13 points (+5|-18)
Noam Chomsky Drops Truth Bomb: Leftists claims that a Trump presidency could "shake up the system" and therefore be positive. "It was the same point people said about Hitler", submitted: 11/27/2016 12:03:22 PM, -10 points (+3|-13)
How to turn anything into a racist symbol, submitted: 9/13/2016 12:58:31 PM, -3 points (+1|-4)
TERROR ATTACK IN GERMAN AIRPORT: 11 Dead 25 Injured, submitted: 3/22/2016 8:54:33 AM, -2 points (+3|-5)
3 highest rated comments:
fujin 5 points 119 points 124 points (+124|-5) ago
This post is VERY VERY telling about @sanegoatiswear. It's starting to make sense, Putt writes "he" in quotations when referring to SaneGoat, in other words Putt is subtlety telling us it's a group or organization orchestrating the actions and direction of that sanegoat account according to what he's seeing on the back end.
This totally makes sense especially when you take into account how myself and others have said SaneGoat seems to have multiple personalities and seems to be working day and night on manipulating the system. (On a side note, I made a post a few months back pointing out how it seemed like someone or some group was trying to test out Voat's system by forcing obviously far left garbage to the front page. Could this be the same group Putt is referencing?)
I wonder what group could be trying to manipulate Voat's userbase actions.
Edit: this is very speculative on my part but SaneGoat would usually call me a
and go over all the points of how I'm strawmanning him...
No response... confirmed?
fujin 1 points 77 points 78 points (+78|-1) ago
Here's my buried comment that covers the Brandenburg vs. Ohio case that you're referring to but in a nutshell:
There's a clear difference between freedom of speech which includes saying things like "gas the kikes", "killer niggers", etc and inflammatory speech like inciting imminent violence, call to arms, etc which is NOT protected under the US First Amendment.
As per Brandenburg vs. Ohio, here's what crosses the line with inflammatory speech and what will trigger the government to get involved (e.g. force the admins to clean shit up or shut down the site):
The speech is “directed to inciting or producing imminent lawless action,” AND
The speech is “likely to incite or produce such action.”
The Brandenburg test is currently the unbeaten precedent upheld by the courts for speech that could be seen as instigating violence.
I can almost guarantee that there are teams (government and non-government) dedicated to watch and observe what we post on this site, waiting for comments that they can use to mount a case against Voat and eventually get this site shut down like they've already done to some others. And I'm sure there are active users on here from said groups that are giving us rope to hang ourselves.
3 lowest rated comments:
fujin 11 points -5 points 6 points (+6|-11) ago
And of course @SaneGoatiSwear is nowhere to be found. By the time he does respond it will be something along the lines of "this isn't good enough, blah blah blah, WHY ARE THE ADMINS BEING MEAN TO ME!!!1" it's because he's Amalek and Amalek I'd never pleased.
fujin 6 points -4 points 2 points (+2|-6) ago
I agree with his comment. It's still freedom of speech. If you enjoy saying fucked up things to people you should be fully ready for the repercussions.
This goes down on both sides of the isles.