Profile overview for fluhthreeex.
Submission statistics

This user has mostly submitted to the following subverses (showing top 5):

4 submissions to videos

3 submissions to whatever

This user has so far shared a total of 4 links, started a total of 3 discussions and submitted a total of 37 comments.

Voting habits

Submissions: This user has upvoted 55 and downvoted 0 submissions.

Comments: This user has upvoted 80 and downvoted 0 comments.

Submission ratings

5 highest rated submissions:

5 lowest rated submissions:

L.A. Burning: The Riots 25 Years Later - Gun Store Manager David Joo Looks Back | A&E, submitted: 3/8/2018 6:37:51 AM, 1 points (+1|-0)

Chappelle's Netflix Special - something-or-other and pigeon talk.. or something like that, submitted: 3/22/2018 4:46:55 AM, 2 points (+3|-1)

Inside the State Department's Troll Farm - Daniel McAdams on The Corbett Report, submitted: 3/8/2018 12:13:28 PM, 3 points (+3|-0)

'Freedom fighters' on a wage: Pentagon requests $30mn salary budget to fund Syrian terrorists, submitted: 3/8/2018 1:35:28 PM, 11 points (+11|-0)

We had to bear arms - The LA Riots, submitted: 3/8/2018 7:41:41 AM, 14 points (+14|-0)

Comment ratings

3 highest rated comments:

HuffPo doxxes female white nationalist schoolteacher -- learn from her mistakes submitted by Don-Keyhote to news

fluhthreeex 0 points 9 points (+9|-0) ago

...and basically her real name.

But why shouldn't she? Why should she be crucified for this?

When one individual targets another it's called "bullying". When a multi-billion dollar "news" organization single out one person it's called "saving the world from another white supremacist".

Is it time that we fork Voat? submitted by TeranNotTerran to AskVoat

fluhthreeex 1 points 8 points (+9|-1) ago

There's no reason to deliberately be offensive to most people. Claiming it's to test them to see if they're 100% OK with free speech is like a Liberal saying if you're not comfortable with gays butt-fucking each other in public and throwing aids blood on you when you're in public then you're not a real Progressive.

3 lowest rated comments:

President Trump: We are on the losing side of almost all trade deals ... Our Steel and Aluminum industries are dead. Sorry, it's time for a change! MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN! submitted by guinness2 to politics

fluhthreeex 5 points -3 points (+2|-5) ago

As long as the steel is being produced and refined using renewable energy and not CO2 producing sources, why not? If the total amount of steel produced in the world remains constant then having it done here in the US should have no difference on anything (assuming the only real waste byproduct is CO2--likely wrong). Especially if we can bring more automation and cheaper clean energy into the process.

...as long as it's priced competitively (there are people who will buy it) so it doesn't turn out to be like the "Russian LNG" debacle that Europe simply told the U.S. Gov't to "go fuck themselves" over and went ahead and bought Russian Natural Gas anyway because it was so cheap. So cheap that even some was shipped to and purchased here in the U.S.

I understand the "National Security" importance of having a Steel Industry, but when shit-hole countries make it shit-tons cheaper at some point you have to say this battle isn't worth fighting. But the U.S. isn't the best at making those calls, historically. I don't know the steel industry or what's going to be done here though so it could be yugely fantastic. I hope so. If "Security" is what this is about though, we don't need aircraft carriers, ships, subs, vehicles, armed forces, or really much of anything as far as a military goes though. We need technology that's better than everyone else's, and weapons systems (missile, laser, kinetic, space-based, and maybe some indestructible robot overlords). Empire is killing us economically, not "Bad deals on Steel". Our fealty towards Israel is killing us, not "Bad deals on Steel". Not to say don't fix problems, but lets keep in mind what really matters.

Why is it wrong to enslave black people but enslaving Chinese people to make our products and goods is perfectly okay? submitted by DieselBustersYes to AskVoat

fluhthreeex 4 points -2 points (+2|-4) ago

Sure they do. Just not the right to prance around, butt-fuck, and spray each-other and passers-by with aids-blood in public.

What do you consider "real rights"? Those? The "right" to infect someone else with HIV without any legal consequences?

How is the US' tyrannical regime that wants nothing more than conquest, empire, absolute domination and control, while trying as hard as possible to give their citizens the illusion of freedom and treating each one of them like terrorists any better or worse than China, at the end of the day?

We can't defeat our enemies, and we can't even get along with our allies for fucks sake. Have you heard that dumb cunt Nikki Haley when she opens her mouth at the U.N.? If stupidity were fatal that bitch would be dead.

If you grew up in China your main complaints would probably be the lack of women, and maybe pollution, and traffic, depending on where you lived.

They cut off rapist Tyrone's dicks in public for fucks sake. I want that in my world.

Teacher arrested after forcing child to stand during Pledge submitted by fudencio to news

fluhthreeex 1 points -1 points (+0|-1) ago

Yeah! Little shits should be beat more! That'll teach them! ...and if they still don't learn, maybe we should flog 'em! Staple that little fuckers right hand to his heart! Yeahrr!! ...and then once he's learned his lesson and grows up to be a respectable adult we'll give him a gun and a badge and call him a Police officer! Yearhrr!