Profile overview for fighterofthenightman.
Submission statistics

This user has mostly submitted to the following subverses (showing top 5):

1 submissions to letsdraw

1 submissions to newsmods

This user has so far shared a total of 1 links, started a total of 1 discussions and submitted a total of 39 comments.

Voting habits

Submissions: This user has upvoted 18 and downvoted 0 submissions.

Comments: This user has upvoted 46 and downvoted 0 comments.

Submission ratings

5 highest rated submissions:

Sci-Fi Wizard, submitted: 7/10/2015 11:20:49 AM, 15 points (+15|-0)

World news or US focussed?, submitted: 7/7/2015 5:16:38 PM, 4 points (+4|-0)

5 lowest rated submissions:

World news or US focussed?, submitted: 7/7/2015 5:16:38 PM, 4 points (+4|-0)

Sci-Fi Wizard, submitted: 7/10/2015 11:20:49 AM, 15 points (+15|-0)

Comment ratings

3 highest rated comments:

Do liberals ever check their own news sources for bias? Why is Fox always the bogey man, but obviously hard left sources like ABC or MSNBC are fine? submitted by uptherepubic to politics

fighterofthenightman 4 points 10 points (+14|-4) ago

Yeah I was going to say, there is no major 'hard left' news source in America.

Voaters who were here before the Reddit blackout, why were you on Voat? submitted by poplie to AskVoat

fighterofthenightman 0 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago

I've yet to see any discussions/arguments degenerate into stupid name calling, something which seemed the norm on Reddit.

Even topics where people have wildly opposing views, there has been clear, concise debate and point making on both sides.

Shit's cool yo.

Ousted Reddit Employee Victoria Taylor Finally Breaks Her Silence submitted by deleted to news

fighterofthenightman 0 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago

Or sometimes 'reading between the lines'.

3 lowest rated comments:

In a bit to bring other women to Voat, I've wrote a Buzzfeed piece featuring Voat. submitted by KarenK to technology

fighterofthenightman 13 points -3 points (+10|-13) ago

Why not?

One of the major criticisms of Reddit I've seen has been how on Reddit everything is just one big hivemind/circlejerk of the same opinions being recycled. On Voat people have been noting how pleasantly surprised they are at the variety of the discourse and the fact that people can have reasonable debates without resorting to name calling and downvote bombardments.

Given this, why wouldn't it be a great idea to get a large variety of people on here?

deleted by user submitted by MisterDave to England

fighterofthenightman 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago

I'd like to see sources for this, as most of what you're saying seems to be conspiracy and hyperbole straight out of the pages of the daily mail. You're talking about the BBC as if they are the Stasi. Which unless you can back up with some kind of evidence, discredits the legitimate points you've made..

When it comes to chasing people about paying the fee, I agree they can be overzealous. I find it somewhat offensive that they immediately threaten prosecution rather than simply asking for the money or an explanation as to why you're not paying it.

However, I would point you in the direction of this website: When I was a student(and didn't have a TV) I filled this form out once a year and then they leave you alone. Takes about 5 minutes. I feel like you may have built up years of vitriol over something that could have been solved in 5 minutes..

I'm not saying the BBC has a flawless record, far from it in fact. The complicity of the BBC as an institution in the behaviour of Jimmy Saville et al. is a notable example. The BBC needs to fix up. But philosophically you agree that it's worth paying for a television service not overrun with adverts. Surely then it's better to reform the BBC, an institution already in existence, rather than completely dismantle it because of its faults leaving nothing to replace it?

What inspired your username? submitted by TheWhiteWolf to AskVoat

fighterofthenightman 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago

somebody had to be..