This user has mostly submitted to the following subverses (showing top 5):
69 submissions to politics
17 submissions to news
13 submissions to OccidentalEnclave
5 submissions to TheDonald
This user has so far shared a total of 100 links, started a total of 4 discussions and submitted a total of 4225 comments.
Submissions: This user has upvoted 1830 and downvoted 922 submissions.
Comments: This user has upvoted 6956 and downvoted 1491 comments.
5 highest rated submissions:
Murderous Antifa With Bike Lock Outed As San Francisco Area Professor, submitted: 4/20/2017 5:51:35 AM, 261 points (+265|-4)
POTUS names the enemy on stage: ANTIFA, submitted: 8/23/2017 2:32:18 AM, 215 points (+215|-0)
Snopes Caught Lying About Lack Of American Flags At Democratic Convention, submitted: 7/28/2016 9:41:47 PM, 176 points (+182|-6)
'It's A Hate Crime': Black Teens Hospitalize White 'Trump Voter', submitted: 12/1/2016 7:40:11 PM, 159 points (+159|-0)
Man with gun keeps Portland rioters away from his apartment building, submitted: 11/12/2016 12:47:40 AM, 142 points (+142|-0)
5 lowest rated submissions:
SFO adds therapy pig to greet travelers, submitted: 12/6/2016 6:48:32 PM, 1 points (+1|-0)
America First w/ Nicholas J. Fuentes - Exposing the Reagan Battalion, submitted: 3/10/2017 2:52:15 AM, 1 points (+1|-0)
America First with Nicholas J. Fuentes 3/28/17, submitted: 3/29/2017 12:01:18 AM, 1 points (+1|-0)
America First with Nicholas J Fuentes 3/29/17, submitted: 3/30/2017 12:02:42 AM, 1 points (+1|-0)
America First with Nicholas J. Fuentes 4/10/17 - Syria & China, submitted: 4/11/2017 12:16:36 AM, 1 points (+1|-0)
3 highest rated comments:
epsilona01 0 points 77 points 77 points (+77|-0) ago
We first liked WikiLeaks because they exposed Bush's Iraq and Afghan wars. Now, they're dangerous because they're exposing a different politician and political organizations scandals. They're shady because someone that was mysteriously murdered could have been their source. The dead man's parents, and their DNC
enforcer lawyer say it's bad that their son's potentially politically motivated murder should be made political.
The Sunlight Foundation
that has pro-Hillary members on its board said that exposing someone he likes instead of GWB is not striving for objectivity, and that they should reveal their sources and breach the trust they have.
Most of the other pro-DNC organizations they contacted refused to talk about the issue. One unnamed "source" said he was more afraid of being exposed for his crimes by WikiLeaks than by the NSA. Wikileaks also did want to contribute to our hit piece. Oh, and did we mention Russia? And Putin? Putin! Putin evil! Because that fits into the story somehow!
epsilona01 0 points 72 points 72 points (+72|-0) ago
The title is missing an extremely important word: Innocent.
Which means the British court decided it can impose whatever bullshit requirements on anyone for any reason without any cause. Guess we're back to feudalism on that side of the pond. They're not going to let you folks Brexit, cause your vote doesn't count. Even the EU heads say that they won't accept a no vote.
epsilona01 0 points 63 points 63 points (+63|-0) ago
Keeping with the spirit of the project, Kickstarter should release all their personal info.
3 lowest rated comments:
epsilona01 5 points -3 points 2 points (+2|-5) ago
good point and that is that since 2001 (and probably earlier) there has been way too much corruption and militarization in the police in the country
Except it gets drowned out in all the racism.
epsilona01 3 points -2 points 1 points (+1|-3) ago
Sorry, that's not how authority works.
Your username is fitting to the topic.
edit: am I being downvoted for stating that authority will abuse its authority, or because people don't like me claiming that this is "crying wolf"?
epsilona01 3 points -2 points 1 points (+1|-3) ago
The thing is.. I don't actually care. Which is a bit strange, cause I mostly prefer getting to the truth. But the vehemency of the attacks against Trump for something as small as mentioning this "muslims celebrating 9/11" actually makes it so I couldn't care less as to whether it's true or not.
The media, up to this point, has done such a terrible job. Lousy hit pieces, twisted sound bites, terrible interviews, etc. All of it makes it seems like the media will do whatever they can to lie about this man. The "database of all muslims" is the latest shitty deal, and most media outlets are running with it - and it's a total fucking lie.
These assholes have been shown that they'll happily lie for ratings, or for political reasons. Are we supposed to believe CNN after they edited an interview to twist Trump's words? The same CNN that bragged about their ratings for all the false coverage of the Boston Bombing? The same CNN that famously fakes coverage of Iraq, etc? How about the NY Times? You know, the propaganda rag that gladly sold the American public on GWB's invasion of Iraq?
So yeah.. attacks against Trump don't really work so well when the person making them isn't trustworthy in the slightest. Is it any wonder that people seem to love it when he lambasts them? Or that they don't seem to have been able to hurt his support? Besides - this is a tiny thing, but the media is making fucking Mt Everest out of a bag of potting soil, and it actually makes me like Trump more whether he's right or not.
edit: that's right, downvote me. I'm glad you don't like the truth. Instead of any sort of rational argument against what I say, you prove you don't have one. Which is the heart of the fucking problem. If you don't like Trump, come up with real, valid arguments and get the media to push those instead of bullshit nonsense - for which the backlash is Trump's presidential campaign.