Profile overview for derezzed.
Submission statistics

This user has mostly submitted to the following subverses (showing top 5):

1 submissions to news

This user has so far shared a total of 1 links, started a total of 0 discussions and submitted a total of 37 comments.

Voting habits

Submissions: This user has upvoted 26 and downvoted 0 submissions.

Comments: This user has upvoted 62 and downvoted 5 comments.

Submission ratings

5 highest rated submissions:

Steve Rannazzisi (Kevin from 'The League') admits his 9/11 Story was a lie, submitted: 9/16/2015 4:09:21 PM, 1 points (+2|-1)

5 lowest rated submissions:

Steve Rannazzisi (Kevin from 'The League') admits his 9/11 Story was a lie, submitted: 9/16/2015 4:09:21 PM, 1 points (+2|-1)

Comment ratings

3 highest rated comments:

As governor, Jeb Bush used personal e-mail to discuss security, troop deployments submitted by RunsWithScissors to news

derezzed 0 points 31 points (+31|-0) ago

I would appreciate this upcoming election so much more without a Clinton or a Bush running.

Rutgers to Students: No Such Thing as Free Speech, We Are Watching You, Think Before You Speak submitted by Dexter111 to politics

derezzed 0 points 25 points (+25|-0) ago

Seriously, the fact that it is happening with such prevalence in higher education--it's fucking insane.

Account Deleted By User submitted by shitlord_timelord to news

derezzed 7 points 17 points (+24|-7) ago

The Guardian is sensationalist garbage...there's no way a judge will give her 4 years. Most likely she'll get probation and a fine.

3 lowest rated comments:

Denver's Unconstitutional Harassment of Jury Nullification Activists: The city treats handing out pamphlets near a courthouse as a crime. submitted by axolotl__peyotl to news

derezzed 3 points -2 points (+1|-3) ago

Well, I mean to play devil's advocate, (obviously I believe in a Juror's right to nullify) directly singling out jurors in attempt to sway their votes is kind of fucked. Jurors take an oath to be the finders of fact and follow and apply those facts to the laws in that state prescribed by their legislatures. While I think it is the individual's absolute right to vote how they want to vote, and that nullification is sometimes useful in some cases to draw attention controversial issues (i.e. criminalizing drugs). I just don't think Jurors shouldn't engage in nullification just to nullify because they disagree with a certain law--that would void the entire process.

Denver's Unconstitutional Harassment of Jury Nullification Activists: The city treats handing out pamphlets near a courthouse as a crime. submitted by axolotl__peyotl to news

derezzed 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago

I mean that's our government. We are a Republic, we elect folks to speak for us. I mean should it really be up to an individual person to become the arbiter of morality? Juries should operate as the finders of fact.

Denver's Unconstitutional Harassment of Jury Nullification Activists: The city treats handing out pamphlets near a courthouse as a crime. submitted by axolotl__peyotl to news

derezzed 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago

Obviously it pays to have an educated populace. But I think you're ignoring the possibility of a potential personal stake these folks may have in a certain case. That is jury tampering.