Profile overview for deejf.
Submission statistics

This user has mostly submitted to the following subverses (showing top 5):

720 submissions to GirlsRock

297 submissions to SpeakEasy

281 submissions to TheWinchester

250 submissions to freeculture

227 submissions to CreativeCommons

This user has so far shared a total of 2287 links, started a total of 7 discussions and submitted a total of 1151 comments.

Voting habits

Submissions: This user has upvoted 9644 and downvoted 1051 submissions.

Comments: This user has upvoted 1705 and downvoted 750 comments.

Submission ratings

5 highest rated submissions:

TIL that if we were still a nation of laws, Hillary would be disualified from holding any office under the U.S., submitted: 11/6/2016 11:32:48 PM, 154 points (+157|-3)

Carrie Fisher and Amy Schumer, submitted: 12/30/2016 9:57:44 PM, 123 points (+131|-8)

In case you didn't hate SJWs enough, now they're making suicide about racism, submitted: 7/22/2017 4:41:16 PM, 116 points (+118|-2)

Marvel's all-SJW strategy leading to poor sales, angry retailers. Who knew!?, submitted: 1/3/2017 2:01:19 AM, 110 points (+121|-11)

Do you even irony, bro?, submitted: 6/20/2016 9:13:11 PM, 110 points (+113|-3)

5 lowest rated submissions:

Anger Issues, submitted: 12/29/2016 7:58:09 PM, -9 points (+2|-11)

Tinitus y Sofi Casanova - Comer y Dormir Vol. 1 [CC BY-ND], submitted: 8/16/2017 7:00:29 PM, -5 points (+2|-7)

Taiwanese Mandopop star Ella Chen, submitted: 9/23/2017 11:32:04 PM, -2 points (+3|-5)

Happy Randsday, Voat!, submitted: 2/2/2017 11:36:58 PM, -2 points (+2|-4)

P.O.P - Catch You, submitted: 7/26/2017 7:23:38 PM, -2 points (+3|-5)

Comment ratings

3 highest rated comments:

Whoopi: 'The Constitution Doesn't Say You Can Carry Hundreds of Guns' submitted by newoldwave to news

deejf 0 points 26 points (+26|-0) ago

"Shall not be infringed."

So, um, yes, yes it does. What a witling.

TIL - the FCC had a rule called the Fairness Doctrine that required News broadcasters to present issues on politics in manner that was honest, equitable, and balanced. It was eliminated in 1987. submitted by Ex-Redditor to TIL

deejf 4 points 23 points (+27|-4) ago

The "Fairness" Doctrine was a way of ensuring cultural hegemony, nothing more.

Like him or hate him, but Rush Limbaugh's show was only possible after the Doctrine lapsed. The entire culture of alternative media followed.

Consider that the Fairness Doctrine would have prevented, for example, the truth about Bill Clinton from ever getting out. Newsweek had it, but spiked the story, and it only got out because of the Drudge Report, which would NEVER survive under a Fairness Doctrine not because it has a point of view, but the people put in charge of determining its value would kill it in an instant.

The Fairness Doctrine was never about Fairness, it was about Control.

When your cult is full of voaters submitted by lorlipone to funny

deejf 0 points 21 points (+21|-0) ago

Here's the source.

(I have a thing about making sure creators get credit for their work. :) )

3 lowest rated comments:

"A genius is a genius, regardless of the number of morons who belong to the same race--and a moron is a moron, regardless of the number of geniuses who share his racial origin." - Ayn Rand submitted by deejf to RandomQuotes

deejf 7 points -4 points (+3|-7) ago

Uh huh. I'm sure that's a perfectly factual, objective, and complete representation of what actually happened.

Audit Trail feature for Voat? submitted by deejf to ProtectVoat

deejf 3 points -3 points (+0|-3) ago

how so, I see nothing being abused.

And, of course, your ignorance is the only evidence needed.

This isnt a wiki website.

Irrelevant to the point in contention. You said that such a thing would be abused. Wikis have such a thing. Please provide examples of abuse.

This is irrelevant.

Actually, it isn't, although I concede that it's not a one to one comparison. However, the lack of total and complete perfection of the analogy does not make the analogy irrelevant.

Look, I know im new here,

Beside the point, either way.

but this is just a ridiculous idea and hardly worth the time of devs here.

That is your opinion, but you have yet to back it up with, you know, the kinds of evidence and examples I asked for.

It would seem to me this addition would only be used to stalk people, and it would be abused.

Now, see, there is a reasonable point. It's a pity you only bring it up after going through the dance of dismissal, because your opening with "ridiculous" and other empty rhetoric meant to prejudice other readers against the point before you address the point is either simply bad form on your part, or else bad faith argumentation.

Perhaps, instead of dismissing first and then barely mentioning why, you should make your case first, and back it up with more than "I'm a victim of a stalker", because guess what, bucko? I've had several. I know intimately how narcissists and sociopaths operate, as I've been targeted by multiples of each.

There are benefits to the way things are, I'm not arguing there are not. But there are benefits to what I propose as well. And negatives both ways, too. I've noted that at least once before. I brought this up as something to consider, and specified why I thought it worthy of consideration. Maybe, instead of calling it ridiculous and harumphing about how you personally don't like it, you should address my reasons.