Profile overview for deejf.
Submission statistics

This user has mostly submitted to the following subverses (showing top 5):

670 submissions to GirlsRock

194 submissions to freeculture

169 submissions to CreativeCommons

128 submissions to music

123 submissions to cheers

This user has so far shared a total of 1662 links, started a total of 6 discussions and submitted a total of 856 comments.

Voting habits

Submissions: This user has upvoted 7940 and downvoted 745 submissions.

Comments: This user has upvoted 1403 and downvoted 628 comments.

Submission ratings

5 highest rated submissions:

TIL that if we were still a nation of laws, Hillary would be disualified from holding any office under the U.S., submitted: 11/6/2016 11:32:48 PM, 154 points (+157|-3)

Carrie Fisher and Amy Schumer, submitted: 12/30/2016 9:57:44 PM, 123 points (+131|-8)

In case you didn't hate SJWs enough, now they're making suicide about racism, submitted: 7/22/2017 4:41:16 PM, 116 points (+118|-2)

Do you even irony, bro?, submitted: 6/20/2016 9:13:11 PM, 110 points (+113|-3)

Marvel's all-SJW strategy leading to poor sales, angry retailers. Who knew!?, submitted: 1/3/2017 2:01:19 AM, 110 points (+121|-11)

5 lowest rated submissions:

Anger Issues, submitted: 12/29/2016 7:58:09 PM, -9 points (+2|-11)

Tinitus y Sofi Casanova - Comer y Dormir Vol. 1 [CC BY-ND], submitted: 8/16/2017 7:00:29 PM, -5 points (+2|-7)

Happy Randsday, Voat!, submitted: 2/2/2017 11:36:58 PM, -2 points (+2|-4)

P.O.P - Catch You, submitted: 7/26/2017 7:23:38 PM, -2 points (+3|-5)

S.H.E - Sharpshooter, submitted: 7/9/2017 6:29:32 PM, -1 points (+3|-4)

Comment ratings

3 highest rated comments:

Whoopi: 'The Constitution Doesn't Say You Can Carry Hundreds of Guns' submitted by newoldwave to news

deejf 0 points 26 points (+26|-0) ago

"Shall not be infringed."

So, um, yes, yes it does. What a witling.

TIL - the FCC had a rule called the Fairness Doctrine that required News broadcasters to present issues on politics in manner that was honest, equitable, and balanced. It was eliminated in 1987. submitted by Ex-Redditor to TIL

deejf 4 points 23 points (+27|-4) ago

The "Fairness" Doctrine was a way of ensuring cultural hegemony, nothing more.

Like him or hate him, but Rush Limbaugh's show was only possible after the Doctrine lapsed. The entire culture of alternative media followed.

Consider that the Fairness Doctrine would have prevented, for example, the truth about Bill Clinton from ever getting out. Newsweek had it, but spiked the story, and it only got out because of the Drudge Report, which would NEVER survive under a Fairness Doctrine not because it has a point of view, but the people put in charge of determining its value would kill it in an instant.

The Fairness Doctrine was never about Fairness, it was about Control.

When your cult is full of voaters submitted by lorlipone to funny

deejf 0 points 21 points (+21|-0) ago

Here's the source.

(I have a thing about making sure creators get credit for their work. :) )

3 lowest rated comments:

Pat Benatar - Hit Me With Your Best Shot (Live) [Your "war" is pathetic, Sanegoat] submitted by deejf to GirlsRock

deejf 3 points -3 points (+0|-3) ago

You are weak, you lack discipline. Your words lack strength and meaning. The fallacies in your mind are a burden.

Assertion, assertion, assertion, assertion, assertion, and assertion, and not a whit of actual evidence or argumentation.

Everyone is totally surprised by this, right?

My judgement is sound, I'm the Iron Fist. A once child touched by fire, and destined to be the greatest warrior. Iron Fist is a living weapon. You have no argument over me as I have been chosen. Chosen protector of the path to and from K'un-Lun.

And again with the narcissistic preening about how bleeping awesome you supposedly are. Ni shi shagua.

I am only one Iron Fist in a distinct lineage that extends back 1000's of years. Others will eventually take my place. I fight with honor, discipline and precision,.

Sound. Fury. Signifying nothing. Big whoop.

Im the Iron Fist

You are the gaseous lips, more like.

Your barrage of insults and lies must now be exposed.

Look, Irony Fisted, you made a threat. Want anybody at all to take you seriously? Want us to stop laughing at your Romper Room posturing? Then you need to back up that threat with action.

Of course, you can't. You're just trying to make up for the fact that every female that's ever seen you naked has collapsed in hysterical laughter.

Talk talk talk, but when challenged to back up that talk, you... just talk more.

Keep talking, spunkmuffin. Nobody cares.

Rap 'music' aka Crap comes to China. ....Fuck Off Foreigners" (Gua LaowaiENGLISH TRANSLATION - Fat Shady (Xie Di) Racist shit-Hop Music by some tone deaf little yellow Chengdu bastard submitted by ChippyTubes to music

deejf 3 points -3 points (+0|-3) ago

Aw, poor little Chippy still thinks he can delete and repost and act like music he doesn't like isn't "real" music.

I agree that this song isn't good.

That doesn't invalidate all rap as music or artistic expression. No, not even if you really, really want it to.

Audit Trail feature for Voat? submitted by deejf to ProtectVoat

deejf 3 points -3 points (+0|-3) ago

how so, I see nothing being abused.

And, of course, your ignorance is the only evidence needed.

This isnt a wiki website.

Irrelevant to the point in contention. You said that such a thing would be abused. Wikis have such a thing. Please provide examples of abuse.

This is irrelevant.

Actually, it isn't, although I concede that it's not a one to one comparison. However, the lack of total and complete perfection of the analogy does not make the analogy irrelevant.

Look, I know im new here,

Beside the point, either way.

but this is just a ridiculous idea and hardly worth the time of devs here.

That is your opinion, but you have yet to back it up with, you know, the kinds of evidence and examples I asked for.

It would seem to me this addition would only be used to stalk people, and it would be abused.

Now, see, there is a reasonable point. It's a pity you only bring it up after going through the dance of dismissal, because your opening with "ridiculous" and other empty rhetoric meant to prejudice other readers against the point before you address the point is either simply bad form on your part, or else bad faith argumentation.

Perhaps, instead of dismissing first and then barely mentioning why, you should make your case first, and back it up with more than "I'm a victim of a stalker", because guess what, bucko? I've had several. I know intimately how narcissists and sociopaths operate, as I've been targeted by multiples of each.

There are benefits to the way things are, I'm not arguing there are not. But there are benefits to what I propose as well. And negatives both ways, too. I've noted that at least once before. I brought this up as something to consider, and specified why I thought it worthy of consideration. Maybe, instead of calling it ridiculous and harumphing about how you personally don't like it, you should address my reasons.