Profile overview for bloop-bloop.
Submission statistics

This user has mostly submitted to the following subverses (showing top 5):

23 submissions to funny

8 submissions to MagicMemes

7 submissions to K9SupremacistsUnite

6 submissions to bloopers

5 submissions to whatever

This user has so far shared a total of 83 links, started a total of 3 discussions and submitted a total of 74 comments.

Voting habits

Submissions: This user has upvoted 414 and downvoted 7 submissions.

Comments: This user has upvoted 404 and downvoted 2 comments.

Submission ratings

5 highest rated submissions:

I know it's cheap humor, but it made me laugh, submitted: 4/7/2017 8:30:33 PM, 202 points (+206|-4)

Knock knock, submitted: 11/10/2018 11:49:51 PM, 178 points (+190|-12)

Good analogy, submitted: 4/19/2017 11:46:04 AM, 175 points (+177|-2)

When you realize the meaning of life, submitted: 4/4/2017 5:39:11 PM, 159 points (+163|-4)

We need to ban civilian access to Home Depot, submitted: 4/19/2017 11:52:05 AM, 158 points (+161|-3)

5 lowest rated submissions:

Daughter wants a new iPhone, submitted: 12/31/2017 4:02:10 PM, -12 points (+1|-13)

5 Canadians on what social media is doing to their mental health, submitted: 8/31/2017 2:33:36 AM, -2 points (+1|-3)

Phone calls in the current year, submitted: 12/31/2017 4:24:25 PM, -1 points (+1|-2)

Wonder if the medical assessment being performed by Obama's physician will satisfy the left's bitching and whining., submitted: 1/17/2018 1:10:04 AM, 0 points (+1|-1)

Don't open - dead inside, submitted: 4/4/2017 6:07:40 PM, 0 points (+1|-1)

Comment ratings

3 highest rated comments:

Chairman of Barilla pasta: "Gays can go and eat another brand" submitted by Empress to news

bloop-bloop 4 points 50 points (+54|-4) ago

This is from four years ago. You may wish to delete and resubmit it at v/oldnews.

Little girls as young as 5 model lingerie in 'Victoria's Secret'-style show submitted by tendiesonfloor to news

bloop-bloop 1 points 24 points (+25|-1) ago

The destruction of healthy social norms and boundaries and the respect for purity, innocence, and childhood is well upon us.

The words the CDC is now forbidden to use are "vulnerable," "entitlement," "diversity," "transgender," "fetus," "evidence-based" and "science-based." George Carlin would flip. submitted by Kannibal to politics

bloop-bloop 6 points 11 points (+17|-6) ago

Nauseatingly ironic. That is utterly obstructive behavior. And it appears to be very unclear where this ban originated from. It needs to be fought off intensely. I see that it's a ban restricted to this case:

in any official documents being prepared for next year’s budget.

But it seems malicious and manipulative, not to mention counter to basic rights guaranteed to Americans. How would we find the truth about anything if we were restricted from using keywords? As a site full of people who condemn fake news, we should condemn any interference with seeking truth, regardless of ideology.

This is going to put excess red tape (read: that's NOT conservative) on even non-controversial areas of study (like which populations are most vulnerable to types of cancers and which cancer treatments show evidence-based or science-based efficacy).

3 lowest rated comments:

Why are the bans and rules on THIS private, personal, small subverse a problem for some people, but v/BetaHate and v/fatpeoplehate are not? submitted by bloop-bloop to TruthHurts

bloop-bloop 5 points -3 points (+2|-5) ago

Another response of 0 substance that fails to address anything I actually said.

Why are the bans and rules on THIS private, personal, small subverse a problem for some people, but v/BetaHate and v/fatpeoplehate are not? submitted by bloop-bloop to TruthHurts

bloop-bloop 4 points -2 points (+2|-4) ago

That's probably because you have nothing intelligent to contribute besides circle jerking somebody else's irrelevant, nonsubstantive ad hominem.

Just because I disagree with you doesn't mean I need a safe space. I am here to challenge myself.

Why are the bans and rules on THIS private, personal, small subverse a problem for some people, but v/BetaHate and v/fatpeoplehate are not? submitted by bloop-bloop to TruthHurts

bloop-bloop 4 points -2 points (+2|-4) ago

Your assertion has nothing to do with my post. I don't even understand how you contrived that.

Are you capable of composing a salient response to my argument?