Profile overview for VictorSteinerDavion.
Submission statistics

This user has mostly submitted to the following subverses (showing top 5):

1 submissions to videos

1 submissions to TheDonald

1 submissions to MeanwhileOnReddit

This user has so far shared a total of 3 links, started a total of 0 discussions and submitted a total of 622 comments.

Voting habits

Submissions: This user has upvoted 639 and downvoted 49 submissions.

Comments: This user has upvoted 1372 and downvoted 118 comments.

Submission ratings

5 highest rated submissions:

MODNews: Deleted user cleanup OR opportunity to 'cleanse' undesirables?, submitted: 12/2/2015 11:54:08 PM, 7 points (+7|-0)

A Message to Donald Trump from Robert David Steele (video 50mins), submitted: 2/11/2017 11:09:37 AM, 3 points (+3|-0)

2015 Blackhat Keynote - The law, security and censorship of the internet, submitted: 8/12/2015 11:14:15 AM, 2 points (+2|-0)

5 lowest rated submissions:

2015 Blackhat Keynote - The law, security and censorship of the internet, submitted: 8/12/2015 11:14:15 AM, 2 points (+2|-0)

A Message to Donald Trump from Robert David Steele (video 50mins), submitted: 2/11/2017 11:09:37 AM, 3 points (+3|-0)

MODNews: Deleted user cleanup OR opportunity to 'cleanse' undesirables?, submitted: 12/2/2015 11:54:08 PM, 7 points (+7|-0)

Comment ratings

3 highest rated comments:

New York Times dramatically rewrites a new Hillary Clinton email story after midnight submitted by VegasAmy to news

VictorSteinerDavion 0 points 188 points (+188|-0) ago

As soon as all the corrections which happened to be necessary in any particular number of The Times had been assembled and collated, that number would be reprinted, the original copy destroyed, and the corrected copy placed on the files in its stead.
This process of continuous alteration was applied not only to newspapers, but to books, periodicals, pamphlets, posters, leaflets, films, sound-tracks, cartoons, photographs – to every kind of literature or documentation which might conceivably hold any political or ideological significance.
Day by day and almost minute by minute the past was brought up to date.
In this way every prediction made by the Party could be shown by documentary evidence to have been correct, nor was any item of news, or any expression of opinion, which conflicted with the needs of the moment, ever allowed to remain on record.
All history was a palimpsest, scraped clean and reinscribed exactly as often as was necessary.
In no case would it have been possible, once the deed was done, to prove that any falsification had taken place.

1984 By George Orwell.

For some it was a work of speculative fiction, for others it became a how to guide.

/r/Dworkinator, SRS mod, claims that they snipped Voat's paypal. submitted by johnparish to MeanwhileOnReddit

VictorSteinerDavion 0 points 53 points (+53|-0) ago

How is this not a criminal activity?

As in, Reddit Corporate are encouraging volunteer members of authority to engage in anti competitive tactics against voat.

Last I heard the EU has a very dim opinion of anti-competitive activities.

I'm glad for threads like that one, it makes it easier to tag all the delusional crybabies.

Girls More Anxious about Mathematics, STEM Subjects Compared to Boys. Gender equality and female role models not making a positive difference, study finds. submitted by http404 to science

VictorSteinerDavion 0 points 48 points (+48|-0) ago

What's there to be anxious about with mathematics?

It's possible to be wrong and being wrong isn't a part of 'you can be whatever you want to be'

Being good at STEM also don't bring any kind of social validation and provides no immediate way to evaluate your social standing.
And it takes time to get good at it.

Western society makes a point of teaching little girls that the only things that matter is what everyone else thinks of you right now and anything that takes effort will be done by someone else.
Which is extreemly dissapointing to witness as I've met females of all ages that have a high interest and want to get into STEM type feilds but dont because they fear ridicule from thier peers if they persue thier interests.

I've yet to meet a guy working in STEM that doesn't want more women involved.

3 lowest rated comments:

17-year-old "refugee boy" in Finland turns out to be 20-year-old former prisoner with military background submitted by pandabill to news

VictorSteinerDavion 12 points -4 points (+8|-12) ago

They can survive easier than anyone else

What assumptions bring you to that conclusion?

Also you're being rather misogynistic by assuming that females in the same category are unable to demonstrate the same abilities.

It's about who is really in danger and who is not.

Humans are in danger, why do you advocate discrimination, are you this openly sexist in the real world?

I don't actually disagree with your statement, these 'gentlemen' should grow a pair and work to defend the life they want to live instead of running away. But I'm not afraid to call my position what it is: bigoted (based on my opinion of what this sub-group of humans should do).

What I am asking is, can you be self aware enough to identify when you're acting in a bigoted/sexist/discriminatory way?
Are you able to set aside any preconceived notions and expectations and reevaluate a group of people on their actions instead of what you think they'll do?

Russia Claims ISIS Now on the Ropes as Fighters Desert After 60 Airstrikes in 72 Hours submitted by axolotl__peyotl to Worldnews

VictorSteinerDavion 2 points -2 points (+0|-2) ago

My comment is basically that if you believe anything coming from any media you are falling for the same manipulation you claim the russian state media is performing.
And unless you are there in person, you are getting all your media from state run organizations.

Of course the reports coming out of this event are being heavily spun by the russians to favor the russians.
In the same way, reports from the U.S. is being heavily spun to favor the U.S.

My use of your comment quotes is intended to highlight the hypocrisy in the comment wherein you present the information from one side of a conflict as being more accurate than another side.
The reality is both governments are needing to present the situation as favorable to themselves.

I can get behind Russell Brand, if you know what I mean. submitted by GeorgeBurns to Conspiracy

VictorSteinerDavion 2 points -2 points (+0|-2) ago

Why?