This user has mostly submitted to the following subverses (showing top 5):
5 submissions to whatever
2 submissions to videos
2 submissions to funny
2 submissions to Libraries
1 submissions to losangeles
This user has so far shared a total of 14 links, started a total of 10 discussions and submitted a total of 633 comments.
Submissions: This user has upvoted 177 and downvoted 122 submissions.
Comments: This user has upvoted 318 and downvoted 110 comments.
5 highest rated submissions:
Japanese Donald Trump Commercial, submitted: 6/17/2016 2:24:18 AM, 55 points (+58|-3)
TIL - Krill occupy more biomass than Humans and possibly more than any other animal., submitted: 9/12/2015 11:05:10 AM, 38 points (+38|-0)
World governments are deliberately orchestrating the refugee crisis to normalize Muslim & Western cultures because the Middle East will be inhospitable by 2050., submitted: 5/20/2016 2:05:04 AM, 32 points (+35|-3)
Check Dates on Posted Articles, submitted: 5/3/2018 6:57:24 PM, 31 points (+32|-1)
What do you call a belt made out of watches?, submitted: 8/9/2018 12:34:23 AM, 20 points (+21|-1)
5 lowest rated submissions:
TOMMY CASH - WINALOTO, submitted: 11/28/2016 5:01:37 AM, -1 points (+1|-2)
Gruesome Footage of Dairy Calves Exposes a Gaping Loophole in California's Landmark Animal Welfare Law, submitted: 10/8/2018 6:36:44 PM, 0 points (+1|-1)
Launching point on planting trees - LA Bureau of Street Services, submitted: 9/23/2018 6:00:16 PM, 1 points (+1|-0)
.PWR BTTM., submitted: 4/11/2017 3:04:18 AM, 1 points (+2|-1)
A neutron walks into a bar..., submitted: 10/24/2016 6:34:21 AM, 1 points (+1|-0)
3 highest rated comments:
UnknownCitizen 4 points 47 points 51 points (+51|-4) ago
shaking off the chains of cucdom that have been tied around their necks by the Gaystapo media and Feminazi uneducational system.
I absolutely despise when this sort of ridiculous language is used. It does absolutely nothing for the information being communicated and invalidates the information in the eyes of those outside your niche group. I may not agree with your stances but it doesn't mean you don't have something meaningful to contribute to the conversation and I like reading and evaluating that information. Seeing such juvenile vitriol in there as well really calls into question the legitimacy of your claims.
Aside from how just plan stupid the language being used is, it basically highlights that you are just as bad as those commiting the transgressions you rage against. And that should you take their place, assuming your stances are just, you'd corrupt the system just as badly as it already is, just to your own devices instead.
So so so so stupid.
Mind you, this isn't a personal attack. Just one on the language and diction you and others from your camp use to try and further your agenda.
Saudi Prince: For the life of me, I cannot believe that a country like the US can afford to have someone as president who says, These people are not going to be allowed to come to the US, submitted by Dr_No to Worldnews
UnknownCitizen 1 points 34 points 35 points (+35|-1) ago
Hey there Mr. Saudi Prince Dude, gay man checking in, am I allowed to come to your country? Without getting anything chopped off? Or electrocuted? Or tortured in general?
Also, how many Muslim refugees have you all taken in? Last time I check it was what? Several hundred thousand in Europe, a couple million in Turkey, Jordan and what not and like ZERO in Saudi Arabia?
UnknownCitizen 2 points 28 points 30 points (+30|-2) ago
Because it seems everyone is bitching about California and not actually asking why any of this is taking place, even the OP, I took the literally less than 5 minutes to check why.
California requires ALL components of water filtration systems to be inspected for lead (note: not every unit, just every component of a specific product line) and it looks like this company couldn't figure out how to do that at first, and now won't because of cost. They say that they now don't ship because California doesn't allow for the sale of water filters that make health claims. Considering one of their explanation's sentences said they couldn't ship to California for several years based on a law from 2010, in a post dated 2012, I'm going to go ahead and assuming they are being a bit dramatic. I'm going to conclude it either has to do with cost or lead present in the products that is still limiting them, not the health claims stuff (which I assume they can simply remove from packaging and advertising directed at the state). I know my state can be a bit weird, but requiring water filtration system components to be tested for lead, a heavy metal that's been poisoning humans for 9,000 years and one we still can't seem to keep under control in the US, doesn't seem at all unrealistic.
3 lowest rated comments:
UnknownCitizen 28 points -18 points 10 points (+10|-28) ago
So, freedom of expression only works if your saying something? Is it shitty? Yes. But this is Voat. The community should handle the issue. The moderator is there to moderate completely at their discretion, unless there are community rules. Then the community should handle their issue. The second that voat as a whole starts exercising their will on smaller, less powerful groups, is the second we go down the Reddit Road and into the Digg Ditch.
Note: all within the confines of applicable laws.
UnknownCitizen 17 points -5 points 12 points (+12|-17) ago
Hello, member of the mainstream LGBT community here. In no way shape or form is pedophilia an acceptable practice in the community. And the stats used are a bit silly.
-They make up over 80% of all male child molestation cases and the average pedophile victimizes between 20 and 150 boys before being arrested.
I'd place money on straight men accounting for nearly all cases of female rape, and rape of minor females. A sexual encounter is between two consenting individuals. Children do not have the cognitive capacity to consent to such acts. Anything that places the weight of an adult issue on the shoulders of a child in general should be abhorred.
NOW, if you happen to be a 30-year-old man child that can't take in the idea of two men having intercourse, that's your issue; but its also an issue a 7 year old should not have to be graphically exposed to either and anyone with any sense would agree.
UnknownCitizen 10 points -5 points 5 points (+5|-10) ago
Your comment contributed nothing to the discussion of the article at hand. You offer no substantive furtherance of conversation or information, just aggressive and vitriolic opinion. It's good to get other people's views on things, but downvoat nonetheless. Thanks.