This user has mostly submitted to the following subverses (showing top 5):
25 submissions to ideasforvoat
11 submissions to Voat
9 submissions to science
9 submissions to ScienceCSS
9 submissions to CSS
This user has so far shared a total of 14 links, started a total of 98 discussions and submitted a total of 1744 comments.
Submissions: This user has upvoted 218 and downvoted 74 submissions.
Comments: This user has upvoted 821 and downvoted 318 comments.
5 highest rated submissions:
[Modpost] Please submit science-related images for the scrolling header coming in the CSS redesign, submitted: 3/20/2015 2:39:14 PM, 87 points (+89|-2)
Guy claims "subverse for calling bullshit", no indication of such things inside of subverse, submitted: 6/27/2014 4:02:00 PM, 30 points (+30|-0)
[META] Addition of subverse rules, II, submitted: 11/21/2015 6:22:45 PM, 22 points (+23|-1)
[Tutorial] TSG's weekly CSS tutorials - Week 1: Score bar, submitted: 2/16/2015 4:07:24 PM, 20 points (+20|-0)
Anarchy!!!, submitted: 1/5/2016 6:45:19 AM, 18 points (+42|-24)
5 lowest rated submissions:
New Subverse Rules - Trial period until 1st of February 2016, submitted: 1/2/2016 3:22:43 AM, -16 points (+38|-54)
Temporary post, submitted: 9/2/2015 7:37:32 AM, 0 points (+1|-1)
National Anthem of the Provisional Revolutionary Government of the Republic of South Vietnam, submitted: 9/2/2015 7:46:49 AM, 1 points (+1|-0)
What colour should we have for the sub?, submitted: 5/8/2015 8:56:13 AM, 1 points (+2|-1)
eggs , also seriously we need 10 characters now man thats fukn bullsh, submitted: 6/17/2015 5:01:31 PM, 1 points (+1|-0)
3 highest rated comments:
Teh_Sauce_Guy 1 points 17 points 18 points (+18|-1) ago
Censorship happens with mass brigading, but banning brigading would in itself be censorship, what can be done about this?
Teh_Sauce_Guy 0 points 15 points 15 points (+15|-0) ago
That's a shame, I hope you get another investor.
Teh_Sauce_Guy 3 points 14 points 17 points (+17|-3) ago
There are a lot of reasons the suggestion is bad.
3 lowest rated comments:
Teh_Sauce_Guy 37 points -26 points 11 points (+11|-37) ago
Mods are users too. We'll only investigate a link if it has enough reports about pseudoscience (otherwise someone could go on a trolling spree and report everything) or if it has an extraordinary claim in the title (extraordinary claims will require evaluation). We will also be appointing more moderators if we deem the workflow to be excessive.
Teh_Sauce_Guy 40 points -19 points 21 points (+21|-40) ago
Look, there's a difference between a radical claim pseudoscience. If someone posts a link to a theory like, I don't know... the earth is flat, and the theory actually follows the proper scientific method, then it's fine to stay. On the other hand, if it's merely pretending to do so, then it isn't. I don't know if I explained this well or not, but there you go.
Teh_Sauce_Guy 27 points -16 points 11 points (+11|-27) ago
I have put our rules into trial period, I hope you guys have no objections. Please do not delete posts that do not fall outside the bounds of the rules and please inform all users if their posts have been removed (egregious repeat offenders need not be notified for every post, as it is timewasting).