This user has mostly submitted to the following subverses (showing top 5):
70 submissions to whatever
44 submissions to funny
25 submissions to AskVoat
18 submissions to news
15 submissions to videos
This user has so far shared a total of 196 links, started a total of 84 discussions and submitted a total of 4337 comments.
Submissions: This user has upvoted 3033 and downvoted 373 submissions.
Comments: This user has upvoted 7154 and downvoted 1820 comments.
5 highest rated submissions:
When you try to make your trolling more and more obvious, but they still don't pick up on it, submitted: 4/13/2017 2:23:43 PM, 308 points (+317|-9)
Young Republicans wanted Milo on campus, were told it could only happen if they paid security costs. They paid, and security failed. They should be refunded., submitted: 2/2/2017 4:31:48 AM, 199 points (+200|-1)
PSA: If you're bored with the frontpage, browse v/all - new. There's lots of off-the-wall posts that need your early upvoats to survive., submitted: 4/19/2017 2:31:18 AM, 191 points (+195|-4)
Please don't feed the Reddit trolls who have been plaguing Voat the last few weeks. They are constantly berated and downvoated, but they're succeeding in causing arguments instead of discussions., submitted: 8/11/2016 12:51:43 AM, 190 points (+201|-11)
Barack learns to pee while standing up, submitted: 8/7/2017 12:08:16 AM, 179 points (+195|-16)
5 lowest rated submissions:
TIL SaneGoat has never denied raping and murdering a woman in 1990, submitted: 3/29/2017 8:52:24 PM, -4 points (+3|-7)
HIS NAME IS JOHN CENA, submitted: 2/22/2016 12:51:29 AM, -1 points (+2|-3)
CNN Article - Sanders quits again, concedes Missouri to Clinton, submitted: 3/18/2016 2:57:07 AM, 0 points (+2|-2)
AMAZING DOLPHIN SHOW (Every Moment Is Stunning), submitted: 6/11/2016 10:01:32 PM, 0 points (+1|-1)
What is up with /v/Science? Is it a subverse for smug users who only want to hear about ground-breaking scientific discoveries, or do they want an active sub of interesting old and new science info?, submitted: 1/13/2017 5:06:07 AM, 0 points (+7|-7)
3 highest rated comments:
Samsquamch 0 points 66 points 66 points (+66|-0) ago
The laws have been around for awhile, but the police have discretion in enforcing them. Which means unless they have reason to believe there is a high possibility of you committing a crime while wearing a mask in public, they probably won't harass you.
Ironically, these laws became common place in the US as a way to combat anonymous crimes committed by the KKK.
Samsquamch 1 points 62 points 63 points (+63|-1) ago
New reasons everyday on why you shouldn't let emotional women run the country. Not a dig on women, there are plenty who can keep their emotions in check, but they aren't usually the ones running for political positions as a liberal.
3 lowest rated comments:
Samsquamch 11 points -8 points 3 points (+3|-11) ago
I don't agree with this, but the officer was not breaking the law in doing this.
Samsquamch 11 points -5 points 6 points (+6|-11) ago
"Our adopted term 'Socialist' has nothing to do with 'Marxian Socialism'"
Just like how niggers changed the definition of "racist" to suit their needs? You're not any better. If you need a different term to describe what you do, use a different term. Don't use one that has a history and meaning nearly 100 years old before you tried to co-opt it.
Your arguments will be more believable if you use the actual definition of words:
a political and economic theory of social organization that advocates that the means of production, distribution, and exchange should be owned or regulated by the community as a whole.
Samsquamch 6 points -5 points 1 points (+1|-6) ago
So you admit to trying to change the definition. At least we can agree on something