This user has mostly submitted to the following subverses (showing top 5):
12 submissions to HardNews
8 submissions to travel
7 submissions to news
5 submissions to politics
2 submissions to newsubverses
This user has so far shared a total of 37 links, started a total of 6 discussions and submitted a total of 476 comments.
Submissions: This user has upvoted 281 and downvoted 323 submissions.
Comments: This user has upvoted 230 and downvoted 198 comments.
5 highest rated submissions:
As governor, Jeb Bush used personal e-mail to discuss security, troop deployments, submitted: 8/18/2015 6:24:28 PM, 346 points (+372|-26)
DNA Frees Man Who Served 34 Years for Teen's Murder, submitted: 8/14/2015 2:24:40 AM, 30 points (+30|-0)
Jeb Bush: NSA needs broader powers to combat 'evildoers', submitted: 8/20/2015 5:49:10 PM, 28 points (+28|-0)
Why arent libertarians rejecting Rand Pauls fight against Planned Parenthood?, submitted: 7/30/2015 6:53:40 PM, 19 points (+24|-5)
Poll: 63 percent oppose defunding Planned Parenthood, submitted: 8/4/2015 8:22:45 PM, 19 points (+20|-1)
5 lowest rated submissions:
Donald Trump Talks Like a 4th Grader: Report, submitted: 8/14/2015 8:41:04 PM, 0 points (+2|-2)
Donald Trump Talks Like a Third-Grader, submitted: 8/14/2015 8:41:38 PM, 1 points (+4|-3)
Can You Protect Your Tummy From Traveler's Diarrhea?, submitted: 8/7/2015 8:36:28 PM, 1 points (+1|-0)
Travel to stay low-hassle in Europe: EU rules out changes to passport-free travel area, submitted: 8/25/2015 1:18:55 AM, 1 points (+1|-0)
Googles App Engine For PHP Hits GeneralAvailability, submitted: 7/8/2015 5:55:49 PM, 1 points (+1|-0)
3 highest rated comments:
RunsWithScissors 2 points 117 points 119 points (+119|-2) ago
I have nothing against GMO's per se, I just think that:
- The companies selling the GMO's should not be allowed to also do the science on their safety and environmental impact. Right now, we're trusting the same companies that sell aspartame (which is illegal in much of the world) to give us their word on the science. That's not good enough. We need a lot more environmental impact study in particular, and the companies shouldn't self-report the science.
- Consumers should be able to know whether they want GMO's or not. Why not let the market decide?
- Patent protection on GMO's is out of control. Monsanto has repeatedly sued farmers after their fields, which contained no GMO's, were infected by Monsanto's farms. Monsanto and its partners spread GMO seeds to people's farms, those seeds edge out the others because they're heartier and survive better, then Monsanto sues an unwitting farmer for "patent infringement." That's definitely no good -- and predatory.
RunsWithScissors 9 points 86 points 95 points (+95|-9) ago
Everyone else kicked them out so the tragedy of limited speech is that the only safe places for unrestricted free speech become cesspools.
That's sort of any even free hate speech is a good idea. In wide social circles, it's immediately rebutted. But when hate speech is banned, its few remaining outlets become echo chambers of incestuous amplification.
RunsWithScissors 5 points 70 points 75 points (+75|-5) ago
No one would be paying 90% of their income. It's a marginal rate.
3 lowest rated comments:
RunsWithScissors 15 points -13 points 2 points (+2|-15) ago
For a source without an agenda: http://www.cnn.com/2015/08/27/politics/hillary-clinton-state-department-citizens-united/index.html
Washington Times = automatically assume misinformation, downvoat.
RunsWithScissors 10 points -10 points 0 points (+0|-10) ago
Your first comment has no relationship to your first. You might not be a racist, but you are a xenophobe, and not a worthwhile member of society.
RunsWithScissors 9 points -9 points 0 points (+0|-9) ago
No partisan agenda anyway. Or not enough to matter.
A laziness or sensationalist agenda, sure. But they aren't shills the way Washington Times is.