Profile overview for RojoDiablo.
Submission statistics

This user made no submissions.

This user has so far shared a total of 0 links, started a total of 0 discussions and submitted a total of 97 comments.

Voting habits

Submissions: This user has upvoted 79 and downvoted 19 submissions.

Comments: This user has upvoted 298 and downvoted 38 comments.

Submission ratings

5 highest rated submissions:

This user made no submissions.

5 lowest rated submissions:

This user made no submissions.

Comment ratings

3 highest rated comments:

The FCC is publishing robocallers phone numbers so you can block them for good submitted by ratsmack to technology

RojoDiablo 0 points 32 points (+32|-0) ago

Hold on a sec.

We've been screaming very, very loudly about how ISPs cannot and should not be responsible (nor have any control over) traffic on their networks, that they should not be able to block any traffic based on origination, destination or content.

Phone lines are exactly the same and the way phone lines have worked is exactly how we're trying to make the internet work, with respect to those who build/own/maintain the infrastructure.

The phones need to be a little smarter in handling incoming connections/calls such as a phone firewall with active whitelists, just like an adblocker or anti-virus. That's it.

Bethesda torpedoes patreon-style donation website for modders, reportedly plans to bring back paid mods after Fallout 4 submitted by ArsCortica to gaming

RojoDiablo 1 points 28 points (+29|-1) ago

If paid mods are coming back, I'm not giving Beth another dime.

The fastest way to completely ruin modding is to monetize amateur work. The only reason people should mod a game is to change or fix the gameplay in some meaningful way or add content BECAUSE THEY WANT TO, not to get paid.

All we'll end up with is a polarization of a couple exceptional mods made by teams and a hundred billion shitmods that will either rip off code or do next to nothing for the game.

Mozilla blasts Microsoft for making it harder to switch to Firefox in Windows 10 submitted by Frakir to technology

RojoDiablo 2 points 25 points (+27|-2) ago

Honestly, with as much shit as MS deserves for the privacy FUBAR in Windows 10, this wasn't something I got in a twist over.

You have to explicitly tell the OS what you want to be the default. Programs can't hijack your default [whatever] anymore. That's actually a good thing.

I installed 10 on my Surface last night. When I set Firefox as default under a new user account, I got the Default Programs settings window automatically, allowing me to set Firefox as the default browser there. It was literally two or three more mouse clicks for a setting I won't have to change again and it's apparently keeping any malicious application from screwing with the defaults.

I don't think I'm crazy for being ok with this.

After I spent 20+ minutes disabling all the ridiculous personal data mining app integration features, the only complaint I have with 10 on the Surface over 8.1 is the brightness setting in the notification/settings slider only allows 25%, 50%, 75%, 100% instead of being a slider. I need 0% for night-time reading.

But I've used it for a grand total of 2 hours so I'm sure I'll find something else to piss me off.

3 lowest rated comments:

DoNotSpy10 Simply Block spy Options In Windows 10 submitted by roznak to technology

RojoDiablo 2 points -2 points (+0|-2) ago

I wish you guys would stop posting this incredibly unhelpful circle-jerk spam in every post about Windows 10.

People have to use Windows for some reasons or another (FUCKING DEAL WITH IT!) and this shit being the top comment does not help anyone at all, least of which the people that may be interested in information regarding the actual post in question for a program used to disable acquisition of personal/telemetry data.

deleted by user submitted by MikeHawksRagen to technology

RojoDiablo 2 points -1 points (+1|-2) ago

absolutely and incredibly easily ruin the US if it came to war. The US currently doesn't have a strong military presence compared to anyone, let alone Russia.

Friend, you are positively off your rocker.

Faith in the US Federal government has precisely dick-all to do with how insanely fast the US military would utterly obliterate ANY other country's ability to wage war on foreign soil.

You think the US Armed Forces would stand down, allowing a foreign power bomb bases/installations or even the mainland just because the Executive branch might draw us into conflict? Listen to what you're saying and how preposterous it sounds, please.

Even aside from an immediate, overwhelming military response from the US in the event of any attack, NATO would draw almost all of Europe into the conflict on the US' side as well.

deleted by user submitted by MikeHawksRagen to technology

RojoDiablo 1 points -1 points (+0|-1) ago

Nope. Who said anything about the mainland?

You did. Right here:

With Russia's allies too the entire West would get plowed over pretty swiftly. It's sad what Obongo and SJWs/lefties have done to this country.

And you're tinfoil batshit. If Russia had that much of an advantage, it would have been used to bring the whole system down already. Putin wouldn't hesitate to decapitate the government in one second if what you said was actually true.

Russia

Wipe out command and control within hours from innumerable munitions, bombs and cruise missiles with a level of tech two generations ahead of what Russia could put into play. Aside from a simple numbers game where the US simply has more.

India

Seriously? No really, Seriously? India has precisely nothing to gain by starting or joining in on any conflict with the west, and everything to lose. They wouldn't even get involved, besides the fact that they use Russian AND US military equipment.

China

China's economy would immediately tank without Western trade. China has absolutely no interest in reversing their exploding business by ruining that. They NEED the West. They don't need Russia.

Syria

Uh... what? They're going to leave their civil war en masse and go attack the west, are they? With their ancient and mostly destroyed Russian vehicles?

Iran

Right after they finally manage a 'win' in the nuclear deal and are desperately trying to show the world they are not a rogue state that will threaten the world, they'll go attack the West? No. No they wouldn't.

Iraq

Ok this part is just laughable and beyond that, I'm not even bothering.