Profile overview for PeaceSeeker.
Submission statistics

This user has mostly submitted to the following subverses (showing top 5):

158 submissions to OneTruePutt

63 submissions to Poetry

60 submissions to voatdev

50 submissions to FakeVoatTestClub

39 submissions to whatever

This user has so far shared a total of 133 links, started a total of 326 discussions and submitted a total of 10787 comments.

Voting habits

Submissions: This user has upvoted 31466 and downvoted 365 submissions.

Comments: This user has upvoted 43362 and downvoted 1008 comments.

Submission ratings

5 highest rated submissions:

5 lowest rated submissions:

Why does Voat have restrictions on accounts with negative CCP?, submitted: 4/18/2017 10:08:47 AM, -4 points (+3|-7)

Does Voat or does Voat not support freedom of speech?, submitted: 4/18/2017 3:31:42 PM, 1 points (+8|-7)

Is @VoatBot dead? What do folks think?, submitted: 5/10/2017 9:31:43 PM, 1 points (+3|-2)

Add One More Chat Category, submitted: 5/11/2017 8:58:26 PM, 1 points (+3|-2)

Security Guard Confronts Armed Robbers at Marijuana Dispensary | Active Self Protection, submitted: 7/18/2017 3:12:59 PM, 1 points (+1|-0)

Comment ratings

3 highest rated comments:

Q: What did Voat say to the bad goat? A: Wanna see my hammer? No? Too bad. Here it is. submitted by PuttItOut to Voat

PeaceSeeker 1 points 43 points (+44|-1) ago

Ah, projection. Such a common trait of those who reject Truth.

Jim Acosta's WH press pass revoked submitted by Anonymous171717 to politics

PeaceSeeker 2 points 35 points (+37|-2) ago

Asking for sources is not "being a dick"; it's called thinking critically and demanding evidence in order to quantify claims. This isn't /v/whatever, this is /v/politics, so frankly sources for submissions like this should be standard course.

Would you believe this was on SNL? submitted by tadorno to videos

PeaceSeeker 2 points 26 points (+28|-2) ago

Back when liberals were more interested in combatting neoconservatism than enforcing neomarxism.

3 lowest rated comments:

It's OK to kill an Invading force submitted by Othmar_Regin to whatever

PeaceSeeker 8 points -6 points (+2|-8) ago

Killing those who entered at our invitation corrects nothing.

It's OK to kill an Invading force submitted by Othmar_Regin to whatever

PeaceSeeker 6 points -5 points (+1|-6) ago

So more can enter, with a passion for vengeance? So all decent people in the world can look upon us as the real savages? Do you even understand why European civilization is worth preserving? Why are you so ready to throw justice, respect for individuals, and law out the window?

Our job is to fix our governments so that they are just, lawful, and respecting of individuals, instead of mimicking our corrupted governments in every way.

It's OK to kill an Invading force submitted by Othmar_Regin to whatever

PeaceSeeker 4 points -3 points (+1|-4) ago

You're arguing the case that killing muslims does not get rid of muslims. It is a notion so stupid it is laughable.

I'm not arguing that. However, the fact remains that killing them does nothing to stop more from coming, and in order to prevent that much greater problems will have to be solved.

We have NONE of this. Look at criminals getting let off the hook for rape because they're "too culturally maladapted to our laws." And what respect do whites get? NONE! Law? How many traitorous politicians do you see going to jail? NONE!

Read the rest of my comment first. I acknowledged that our governments lack this; our duty is to bring this back instead of adopting a rejection of these principles for our individual lives.

Yeah, that's what I advocate too, and force is how we get there.

Possibly, but force against a bunch of people who came here through legal processes is not doing a damn thing to fix the governments that caused this mess, and its purely evil and soul-destroying besides.