Profile overview for Mr_Woodblock.
Submission statistics

This user made no submissions.

This user has so far shared a total of 0 links, started a total of 0 discussions and submitted a total of 151 comments.

Voting habits

Submissions: This user has upvoted 39 and downvoted 0 submissions.

Comments: This user has upvoted 225 and downvoted 0 comments.

Submission ratings

5 highest rated submissions:

This user made no submissions.

5 lowest rated submissions:

This user made no submissions.

Comment ratings

3 highest rated comments:

Double Kavastandards submitted by SigniferLux to politics

Mr_Woodblock 0 points 14 points (+14|-0) ago

I can imagine the response to this: "Oh, no one asked to see that at the paaaaarrrrrtttty"

Idiots. No one asked at the parades either.

Remember that time Christine Ford made a cell phone call 2 years before cell phones were invented? MeToo submitted by goatboy to politics

Mr_Woodblock 0 points 11 points (+11|-0) ago

Isn't this a 4chan meme? People were posting it there to troll dems and repubs on purpose. If someone could find any of her testimony where she says this I'll believe it lol.

I just got denied a job because i didn't have a Facebook account, anyone else have this happen before? Should i get one? submitted by OldGoatBlue to AskVoat

Mr_Woodblock 0 points 10 points (+10|-0) ago

Yes I have had it happen, and it's become ubiquitous, so I would mention it in an application and probably say something like "Facebook is nearly ubiquitous, but I do not have an account and don't feel that my private data should belong to 3rd party entities. If you have a question about my background, please ask". That way you mitigate the effects of this standard part of job-hiring culture (you can choose what to share which is mitigating). There might be a more professional way to say that.

3 lowest rated comments:

Minnesota teacher resigns over 'kill Kavanaugh' post submitted by Prudencia_Prim to news

Mr_Woodblock 18 points -10 points (+8|-18) ago

Because (as almost every single article has pointed out) she was being sarcastic. We have very powerful first amendment rights in the U.S.

Edit: This is the first article I have seen on this site that doesn't mention she was being sarcastic, which is why I said "almost"

2nd edit: At -10 downvoats. Damn y'all are determined to make sure no one knows why she isn't liable. Talk about an echo chamber. Liberal spin on news is shitty. The truth isn't. She isn't liable under the law. That is the truth. Grow up and deal with it.

American Bar Association reopening Kavanaugh evaluation due to 'temperament' submitted by wleslie to news

Mr_Woodblock 8 points -8 points (+0|-8) ago

ABA is right. Dudes a crybaby who felt threatened by internet posts and couldn't stay professional on the national stage. The ABA is a professional organization for lawyers and law scholars. Millions of people get threats like that on the internet at this point. ABA can do whatever they want here.

Edit: Like Reddit, everyone gets triggered and simply downvotes instead of thinking it through. The dude was whining his way into an office he's going to suck at in terms of the fourth and fifth amendment. If anything, he'd support investigating everyone on the site for being "terror threats". The cognitive dissonance here blows chunks.

Trump says he could use the MILITARY to build his wall if Congress won't fund it through Homeland Security's budget submitted by zenmastery to politics

Mr_Woodblock 4 points -4 points (+0|-4) ago

I did. Congress makes laws about naturalization. The President enforces them. We are already prosecuting and removing illegal immigrants.

But now I have to read about President Trump making taxpayers pay for a wall he promised Mexico would pay for by skipping Congress entirely? Give me a break. His campaign promise involved me not paying for the wall. He needs to deliver on that promise he made thousands of times, and I will be happy. Walls are expensive. So is enforcing them.

I'm honestly happy with better patrolling. But a wall that we have to pay for? No. I'm not for it.