This user has mostly submitted to the following subverses (showing top 5):
2094 submissions to technology
1200 submissions to news
1121 submissions to politics
1076 submissions to whatever
583 submissions to science
This user has so far shared a total of 8292 links, started a total of 70 discussions and submitted a total of 10100 comments.
Submissions: This user has upvoted 118380 and downvoted 12494 submissions.
Comments: This user has upvoted 39427 and downvoted 2120 comments.
5 highest rated submissions:
It's going mainstream: BOMBSHELL: Hillary's IT Guy Caught Asking How To Destroy Evidence!, submitted: 9/19/2016 7:24:23 PM, 350 points (+358|-8)
Windows 10 will keep spying on you no matter how hard you try to stop it /u/CheesusCrust cited again!, submitted: 2/10/2016 8:21:54 PM, 350 points (+354|-4)
Genetically modified rice makes more food, less greenhouse gas - This is not Roundup Ready, but uses a barley gene, developed at a University, not a corporation, submitted: 8/3/2015 6:34:02 AM, 336 points (+353|-17)
Since Hillary and Jeb both have the same donors, why don't they just run as the Clinton/Bush Money party?, submitted: 8/27/2015 2:25:07 AM, 331 points (+338|-7)
Mark Zuckerberg is a hypocrite - Facebook has destroyed the open web, submitted: 5/10/2016 11:14:38 PM, 322 points (+325|-3)
5 lowest rated submissions:
Why I am Voting for Bernie Sanders; and thoughts on Obama., submitted: 1/29/2016 8:55:15 PM, -7 points (+2|-9)
If Bernie Sanders Is Socialist, Then So Was This Republican Nobel Prize Winning Economist, submitted: 2/9/2016 8:55:13 PM, -5 points (+4|-9)
Ford F-150 Shatters Rivals In IIHS' Crash Tests, Grabs Top Safety Pick [w/Video], submitted: 4/13/2016 12:52:45 AM, -4 points (+4|-8)
I took a photo with the Pixel that changed my mind about the iPhone, submitted: 10/29/2016 10:57:43 PM, -3 points (+1|-4)
Hillary vs. Bernie on Frankenfood - Democratic Underground, submitted: 1/20/2016 1:44:02 AM, -3 points (+1|-4)
3 highest rated comments:
Mixplate 5 points 170 points 175 points (+175|-5) ago
Thank you for your thoughtful and reflective post asking for the community's input. It is quite the dilemma, but it really depends on what your goal is. No one site can be all things to all people, and Reddit actually worked fairly well until the Admins started to take action which is ironically what the Voat users who were escaping tyranny of the Admin are asking you to do now.
I like the idea of experimenting, but the short-term results of an experiment may be markedly different than what may emerge in the long term, so if you do experiment, please let it run long enough to get over the initial few months burst of activity, good or bad, and see where it's evolving.
It seems like the whole reason you're being appealed to for action, is that once you touch something, you sorta own it. Once you start deciding to hand out subverses against the wishes of the community, you own that, even though that wasn't the reasoning behind the decision, that was the situation.
Certain subverses that are "core" to a reddit-like system could be held to a different standard than the typical special-interest ones. AskVoat has Voat's name in it, for one thing, and run well, it should be a hallmark of the site, not "just another subverse", so if you do decide to create expectations for certain types of subverses, what would that be?
3 lowest rated comments:
Mixplate 14 points -12 points 2 points (+2|-14) ago
Enjoy your manufactured outrage.
Mixplate 9 points -9 points 0 points (+0|-9) ago