Profile overview for Lyes.
Submission statistics

This user has mostly submitted to the following subverses (showing top 5):

3 submissions to whatever

This user has so far shared a total of 3 links, started a total of 0 discussions and submitted a total of 129 comments.

Voting habits

Submissions: This user has upvoted 9 and downvoted 0 submissions.

Comments: This user has upvoted 57 and downvoted 3 comments.

Submission ratings

5 highest rated submissions:

CNN accidentally tells the truth, submitted: 9/4/2018 5:03:39 AM, 2 points (+2|-0)

Brother Nathaniel, Jew-turned-Christian: Who's your favorite anti-Semite? (from 2012), submitted: 9/23/2018 5:01:48 AM, 2 points (+3|-1)

Jew-turned-Christian who was at the signing of the Treaty of Versailles, submitted: 9/23/2018 4:47:24 AM, 1 points (+1|-0)

5 lowest rated submissions:

Jew-turned-Christian who was at the signing of the Treaty of Versailles, submitted: 9/23/2018 4:47:24 AM, 1 points (+1|-0)

Brother Nathaniel, Jew-turned-Christian: Who's your favorite anti-Semite? (from 2012), submitted: 9/23/2018 5:01:48 AM, 2 points (+3|-1)

CNN accidentally tells the truth, submitted: 9/4/2018 5:03:39 AM, 2 points (+2|-0)

Comment ratings

3 highest rated comments:

The International Jew - By Henry Ford submitted by Rellik88 to whatever

Lyes 0 points 15 points (+15|-0) ago

Anyone interested in the JQ should read this book. It isn't "anti-'Semitic'" at all, but is instead reasoned and objective. If you want to avoid "racist" screeds or hate-filled diatribes but want to know what's going on, this is a great place to start.

If you are already redpilled on the JQ, this is an amazing book in that it's almost a century old but reads like - well, like Zionists and Bolsheviks had a hundred years to insert themselves into every level of control of American society practically unopposed.

What does it really mean to question the holocaust? submitted by BLOODandHONOUR to whatever

Lyes 1 points 14 points (+15|-1) ago

"Anal gas pumps"? "Peddle [pedal?]-driven brain-bashing machines?"

What you stupid fucks telling us to "look it up" don't seem to realize is that Google and other search engines don't return shit when we search on this bullshit.

All the other shit does, but provide us some links for fucks' sake.You stupid fuckers can't "redpill" people by telling them to "look it up" when the mainstream internet blocks all of that shit. Provide sources or shut the fuck up.

I don't doubt it's all true, I (and others) just want attribution.

EG: rollercoasters of death - a search that actually worked. How fucking hard was that???

Stop f*****g filming and help me!': Houston cop begs security guard to help him arrest suspect who tries to grab for his gun but she refuses and RECORDS him instead submitted by Bill_Murrays_Sandals to news

Lyes 0 points 13 points (+13|-0) ago

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jAfUI_hETy0

Citizen wrestled with NYC subway spree-stabber while cops cowered and watched. He sued the cops for their inaction but a judge ruled (as others have) that cops have NO DUTY TO PROTECT citizens.

Same thing at Mandalay Bay and Parkland - cops stand back cowering while citizens/students get slaughtered, no repercussions and sovereign immunity from lawsuits.

That security guard made the right call; she has no special "get out of jail free card" like cops do and could get sued if the perp were to be injured.

3 lowest rated comments:

Man jailed indefinitely for refusing to decrypt hard drives loses appeal submitted by johnjohn to technology

Lyes 5 points -4 points (+1|-5) ago

You left out this key bit:

Forensic examination also disclosed that Doe [Rawls] had downloaded thousands of files known by their "hash" values to be child pornography. The files, however, were not on the Mac Pro, but instead had been stored on the encrypted external hard drives. Accordingly, the files themselves could not be accessed.

They know he downloaded the files, they know where they are, and they want him to decrypt them. It's not so much about Fifth Amendment as it is about executing a warrant. They don't want his password, they just want him to unencrypt the drive(s), so it's more like unlocking your door when cops show up with a warrant than it is about protection from self-incrimination (at least according to the appeals court):

The authorities, however, said no testimony was needed from Rawls. Rather, they said, (PDF) "he can keep his passwords to himself" and "produce his computer and hard drives in an unencrypted state."

I'm tired of fucking idiots trying to convince me that pitbulls are good dogs and that there's no bad dogs just bad owners, bullshit! submitted by TheAmerican to whatever

Lyes 4 points -3 points (+1|-4) ago

You can "protect yourself" but you're scared of some 50 pound animals?

I'm tired of fucking idiots trying to convince me that pitbulls are good dogs and that there's no bad dogs just bad owners, bullshit! submitted by TheAmerican to whatever

Lyes 3 points -3 points (+0|-3) ago

It's bullshit though - they can't kill a 'human being' - they can kill an unsuspecting child or old woman. Any male paying attention would have no problem dealing with one or two pitbulls.

I'm not trying to insult you, I just think your assertions regarding the hazard pitbulls present is demonstrably utter bullshit.