Profile overview for LupinePride.
Submission statistics

This user has mostly submitted to the following subverses (showing top 5):

1 submissions to veuwer

This user has so far shared a total of 0 links, started a total of 1 discussions and submitted a total of 29 comments.

Voting habits

Submissions: This user has upvoted 27 and downvoted 0 submissions.

Comments: This user has upvoted 153 and downvoted 0 comments.

Submission ratings

5 highest rated submissions:

Feature request: Automatically transcode GIF to WebM, submitted: 7/15/2015 2:41:00 AM, 7 points (+7|-0)

5 lowest rated submissions:

Feature request: Automatically transcode GIF to WebM, submitted: 7/15/2015 2:41:00 AM, 7 points (+7|-0)

Comment ratings

3 highest rated comments:

Are our servers ready for this? submitted by BustyChicksFTW to AskVoat

LupinePride 0 points 17 points (+17|-0) ago

Either way, the link target is all tits-up.

Github disables repository for using the word "retard." submitted by SuperConductiveRabbi to programming

LupinePride 0 points 6 points (+6|-0) ago

FWIW, that's standard legal ass-covering. No different from nearly any website or service out there.

Encrypting all emails makes mass surveillance impossible. Meet Tutanota, my Lavabit replacement. submitted by an0n to technology

LupinePride 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago

sender, recipient, and time of sending

That's the bulk of what they mean by "metadata" anyway, and is more than enough to do all kinds of frightening analysis.

3 lowest rated comments:

Windows 10? Here are privacy issues you should consider submitted by wakowarner to technology

LupinePride 2 points -2 points (+0|-2) ago

You're going to be shown ads one way or another. Wouldn't you prefer they be ones for stuff that you might actually like, rather than "one weird trick" nonsense and pseudo-pornographic flash games?

TIL potatoes were illegal in France between 1748 and 1772 submitted by fuckyeahgoats to TIL

LupinePride 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago

So, let me get this straight. You're saying that the controlled, careful adjustment of specific genes should result in a plant being considered unfit to eat, while blasting plants with destructive radiation that flips genes at random is just fine? Because that's how must of what you're eating now was produced.

Indeed, if you consider things that have been around for decades as not having "existed long enough" to be safe, I'm not sure how you can bear to use a computer, or be in the vicinity of wireless equipment, or ...

deleted by user submitted by vegard to technology

LupinePride 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago

No, self-hosting is pointless and, due to the ridiculous amount of effort it takes for no benefit, incredibly stupid. It doesn't buy you any security, because your emails are still being transmitted in plain text. You need to use real public-key encryption.