Profile overview for LoungeAbout.
Submission statistics

This user has mostly submitted to the following subverses (showing top 5):

8 submissions to gamedev

5 submissions to Unity3D

5 submissions to videos

4 submissions to MakeSomething

2 submissions to trees

This user has so far shared a total of 32 links, started a total of 12 discussions and submitted a total of 169 comments.

Voting habits

Submissions: This user has upvoted 2040 and downvoted 57 submissions.

Comments: This user has upvoted 1669 and downvoted 78 comments.

Submission ratings

5 highest rated submissions:

5 lowest rated submissions:

Dungeon Raiders 2 - Development Begins, submitted: 11/3/2015 5:43:11 AM, 1 points (+1|-0)

[DEV] Pair Soup - Match 3, submitted: 5/10/2016 8:32:09 PM, 1 points (+1|-0)

New Unity products and prices launching in June, submitted: 6/2/2016 3:42:42 AM, 1 points (+1|-0)

The Made with Unity Developer Story Contest, submitted: 6/16/2016 5:21:51 PM, 1 points (+1|-0)

I Dont Make Games for You, submitted: 6/22/2016 2:53:46 AM, 1 points (+1|-0)

Comment ratings

3 highest rated comments:

Patriots, while the MSM and Brock's acolytes continues the strong disinformation/demoralization campaign against Trump right here on Voat, I'd like you to remember this picture. submitted by Rummel to politics

LoungeAbout 0 points 16 points (+16|-0) ago

The Person of the Year issue only looked positive on the surface. The article itself was an attack piece.

Super-Slushy: The Clinton Foundation Netted 2.9% to actual charity work in 2014 submitted by rspix000 to politics

LoungeAbout 0 points 15 points (+15|-0) ago

I double checked all of these numbers and they do add up. I also agree that The Foundation provides less than 3% of its revenue towards improving an actual person's life. But if you read their filing, they claim 80% goes to "fulling [their] programmatic work". The Foundation's programmatic work is bringing the Clintons to events to help those events be successful.

In other words, 77% of The Foundation's budget goes towards giving the Clintons a jet-set life with the appearance of helping those less fortunate.

In the expenses section, there's two things of note. First, the "Other fees" is $7.3m. If it were 10% of the total ($91.3m), the individual expenses would have to be listed. That $7.3m went to non-employees, just short of meeting the amount needed to list who it went to. Second, expenses are broken out by those needed for fundraising. It costs The Foundation $6.7m to raise its money. It then gives out $5.2m.

How long till 'male/female' machine parts are considered offensive? submitted by Chiefpacman to whatever

LoungeAbout 1 points 12 points (+13|-1) ago

Yep, it was pretty standard and made sense with the definition (as in the "slave" must do everything the "master" says or the system will break), but now it's offensive.

We definitely think with words too much; so much so that we let them hurt us.

Edit: I wanted to add that "leader/follower" sounds like it should be a good substitute, but really a "slave" system must fall in line. Do we really want the definition of "follower" to mean "falls in line"?

3 lowest rated comments:

Who do you think should be Trump's VP? Who do you think should be Sanders VP? submitted by CervicalStrike to politics

LoungeAbout 1 points -1 points (+0|-1) ago

Tulsi Gabbard has an awesome record: military service, very liberal, and speaks plainly and clearly.

Its Offical Donald J. Trump behind French Terrorist Attack submitted by jamesed to politics

LoungeAbout 2 points -1 points (+1|-2) ago

Link? I've scoured CNN for this and when I put in your sentence to google, this post is the only reference.

OG Teacher submitted by techram9211 to videos

LoungeAbout 1 points -1 points (+0|-1) ago