Profile overview for Kellam.
Submission statistics

This user has mostly submitted to the following subverses (showing top 5):

12 submissions to ModernPowers

8 submissions to Showerthoughts

6 submissions to dadjokes

5 submissions to askgoat

5 submissions to Voatocracy

This user has so far shared a total of 5 links, started a total of 53 discussions and submitted a total of 673 comments.

Voting habits

Submissions: This user has upvoted 449 and downvoted 48 submissions.

Comments: This user has upvoted 76 and downvoted 26 comments.

Submission ratings

5 highest rated submissions:

If there's one thing that modern society proves, it's that the only way to unify a large group of humans is the mutual hatred of something., submitted: 10/14/2015 12:06:42 PM, 64 points (+67|-3)

Satan's eternal punishment is to eternally torture anyone who tries to help him., submitted: 8/24/2015 2:19:00 AM, 41 points (+45|-4)

Found Atko's theme song., submitted: 8/29/2015 12:22:21 AM, 30 points (+32|-2)

Why do cows wear bells?, submitted: 8/18/2015 1:17:47 AM, 26 points (+26|-0)

What if Leonardo DiCaprio has been secretly requesting that he isn't awarded an Oscar because he knows not having an Oscar gets him fans?, submitted: 9/29/2015 1:48:39 AM, 20 points (+21|-1)

5 lowest rated submissions:

Comment ratings

3 highest rated comments:

Teach a person to fish and they'll still vote for the person who gave them the fish submitted by TerriChris to Showerthoughts

Kellam 2 points 18 points (+20|-2) ago

WFT?

What's Ferguson Thinking?

Why Nothing (mostly) is wrong with the Wii U submitted by Gamestatistic to gaming

Kellam 1 points 15 points (+16|-1) ago

You say that like it's a bad thing.

3 lowest rated comments:

ELI5 Why do murderers still have "human rights" when by killing people they literally invalidated the victim's human rights? submitted by morrwin to ELI5

Kellam 6 points -6 points (+0|-6) ago

Murderers aren't humans, they're liabilities.

ELI5 Why do murderers still have "human rights" when by killing people they literally invalidated the victim's human rights? submitted by morrwin to ELI5

Kellam 3 points -3 points (+0|-3) ago

To me, it's the same concept as if a dog or a gorilla kills a person; there's a thing that is a danger to humans, and has been shown to mortally wound people without a second stop. Are you going to find and catch that gorilla, capture it, sedate it, drag it home and lock it up in your basement, feed it, clothe it, and bring in every single gorilla like it? OR are you going to hunt down the bastard, fill it's tiny brain cavity with as many bullets as it will hold, and kick aside the body?

Murderers aren't people; they're threats, and ought to be dealt with as such.

Account Deleted By User submitted by nastymatt to ideasforvoat

Kellam 3 points -3 points (+0|-3) ago

Two wrongs may not make a right, but even a just king must employ underhanded means to stave off foes that would enact terrors far worse than what would be necessary to kill then before they take root.