Submissions: This user has upvoted 46 and downvoted 14 submissions.
Comments: This user has upvoted 126 and downvoted 32 comments.
5 highest rated submissions:
Trump's Message to Clinton: We turned Sandusky, submitted: 3/9/2017 11:08:22 PM, 110 points (+120|-10)
How to Properly Answer the Question: "Is Pizzagate Real?", submitted: 8/28/2017 8:06:19 PM, 83 points (+86|-3)
Michael Aquino - Absent from Pizzagate Convo...Why?, submitted: 1/30/2018 5:30:20 PM, 68 points (+68|-0)
Egypt Detains 75 people in Human Trafficking Probe, submitted: 1/5/2018 7:22:16 AM, 67 points (+68|-1)
That time CNN called human trafficking a "conspiracy theory" ..., submitted: 3/31/2018 7:46:40 PM, 42 points (+45|-3)
5 lowest rated submissions:
Madeleine McCann: UK police granted extra funds in search for missing child, submitted: 3/12/2017 5:48:23 PM, 1 points (+3|-2)
Long Time Lurker, First Time Poster, submitted: 12/13/2016 8:02:25 PM, 2 points (+2|-0)
History Repeats Itself - Need Help Collecting Data, submitted: 2/16/2017 8:28:39 AM, 4 points (+4|-0)
Has QAnon Mentioned the Super Bowl yet?, submitted: 2/2/2018 3:42:48 AM, 5 points (+6|-1)
We hold these truths to be self-evident..., submitted: 7/4/2017 9:37:09 PM, 8 points (+9|-1)
3 highest rated comments:
HugoWeaving 5 points 48 points 53 points (+53|-5) ago
I disagree with your translation. In fact, I think Alex was telling us exactly who to look at.
The "apology" letter is standard practice in defamation legal suits. After being contacted by Alefantis, Infowars did exactly what every media company does when sued for libel -- draw the distinction between what they reported and what they "commented" on, back off without retracting anything, and then confirming their stance on the issue.
If Alefantis was CIA, or even if he wasn't and has turned on his teammates, he is a protected asset now. Those leads have been investigated and documented. The research is in the right hands.
As for who to haunt next...Epstien, Sandusky, Podesta, Silsby, Clinton, Weiner, Huma...Alex told us who to investigate.
THAT's what Alex Jones is saying...
HugoWeaving 0 points 28 points 28 points (+28|-0) ago
NOTHING she (or any legit politician) does on social media is an "accident." Even if Hillary did not type the tweet herself, SOMEONE in her camp was aware of it. If we accept that, then logically it follows that there is a REASON for choosing THAT tweet/message to blast to the world.
"What goes around COMETS around" is the real message. Translation: Revenge is a bitch.
Her tweet was 100% a threat that if you come for her, she will fight it publicly and burn anyone in the process.
I say, bring it bitch.
HugoWeaving 1 points 18 points 19 points (+19|-1) ago
You're assuming that these guys weren't the GOOD GUYS. (And before you jump all over me, understand I am only suspecting).
But if we had broken through to a younger generation of Saudi men in power, who agreed to turn on their own and provide us evidence of international crime and corruption, then this crash is a LOSS, not a WIN.
So before you celebrate, get the facts.
3 lowest rated comments:
HugoWeaving 8 points -5 points 3 points (+3|-8) ago
@Millennial_Falcon did more for this sub than any of you know. It’s ok to be mad. It’s ok to want change. It’s part of life. It’s the natural progression of crowed sourced research.
Most of you are too new to this forum and don’t understand why moderating this sub is a thankless and uphill battle. You may think that being censored or held to strict rules limits your freedom of speech...but that’s the point. You shouldn’t be here to speak. This isn’t a personal soapbox. This is a place for real researchers to work together to uncover things THEY want buried. And facts matter. Truth matters. Following rules is what WE want THEM to do, isn’t it? Yet we can’t start with us? If anyone and anything is allowed here, then nothing can be trusted. You want the masses to wake up with you? Then you have to lead them to the water. And a pool infested the way this sub becomes these days...that’s undeniably undrinkable.
I have turned down offers to mod along the way because my focus has been research and not baby sitting wanna be social warriors who come here only to refresh their browsers and see how many likes they get...
Without pre judging those stepping up, let’s all work together and make sure that rules are upheld as applied to everyone equally.
Thank you to those who served. Welcome to those who will. Remember who we are doing this all for...they don’t have creative usernames. They don’t have voices.
They have us.
HugoWeaving 5 points -4 points 1 points (+1|-5) ago
@Millennial_Falcon: I wanted to personally thank you for all your time and input. Very few of these people are aware of how much work this sub put in last year when this issue first broke. Truthfully it was a mess and in need of order. You brought that. Maybe it was thankless, maybe you tired of it. I know I did as a poster and researcher. I had to take breaks. I had to walk away and find “life” again.
And for all the newbie whiners who have no clue why harsh moderation was and IS still needed will never understand. I turned down being a mod twice because I knew how polarizing and difficult a job it would be. My skills were and continue to better spent on research and education.
So thank you comrade. Your efforts by those who know why will always be appreciated.
HugoWeaving 2 points -2 points 0 points (+0|-2) ago
HOLY FCK IT'S BEEN A CLOCK THE WHOLE TIME..."Tick Tock"...Hourglass...15...10...5...0!
They solved it way faster in the Hunger Games.