Profile overview for Gerplaunckamo.
Submission statistics

This user has mostly submitted to the following subverses (showing top 5):

1 submissions to LiveDebates

1 submissions to science

This user has so far shared a total of 1 links, started a total of 1 discussions and submitted a total of 26 comments.

Voting habits

Submissions: This user has upvoted 1 and downvoted 0 submissions.

Comments: This user has upvoted 2 and downvoted 0 comments.

Submission ratings

5 highest rated submissions:

The science of debate, submitted: 8/19/2015 6:48:53 AM, 0 points (+5|-5)

Debate Critique -- Pierce Morgan Vs. Alex Jones, submitted: 8/19/2015 6:19:27 AM, -19 points (+5|-24)

5 lowest rated submissions:

Debate Critique -- Pierce Morgan Vs. Alex Jones, submitted: 8/19/2015 6:19:27 AM, -19 points (+5|-24)

The science of debate, submitted: 8/19/2015 6:48:53 AM, 0 points (+5|-5)

Comment ratings

3 highest rated comments:

Hackers Finally Post Stolen Ashley Madison Data submitted by vanityesterday to technology

Gerplaunckamo 5 points 5 points (+10|-5) ago

Why didn't these faggots release the data from the Cougar Life site, under the parent company of Avid Life Media? Because they're faggot white knights who HATE MEN. Ashley Madison and Established Men--both sites info released. Cougar Life, safe because women's feels.

Drought in California...people used to swim here submitted by cynoclast to pics

Gerplaunckamo 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago

That Almond Milk...he's so hot right now.

A man representing 2,350+ professionals appeared on C-SPAN 1 year ago to discuss the science behind all 3 tower collapses on 9/11--it's now the Most Popular video on the C-SPAN site with 400,000 views submitted by SmedleyButler to science

Gerplaunckamo 5 points 2 points (+7|-5) ago

This thread is on the frontpage:

A man representing 2,350+ professionals appeared on C-SPAN 1 year ago to discuss the science behind all 3 tower collapses on 9/11--it's now the Most Popular video on the C-SPAN site with 400,000 views

Researching the claims produced this popular sentiment:

Many mainstream scientists choose not to debate proponents of 9/11 conspiracy theories, saying they do not want to lend them unwarranted credibility.

The problem is this is the most common sentiment used today: demonize the messenger so you don't have the be held accountable to the message. Refuse to debate your critics. This implies that ignoring criticism undermines its credibility. But just the opposite is true. Ignoring criticism bolsters the critics.

This is an important principle of debate. The truth is not threatened by public scrutiny, but cowardly keyboard warriors today seem to think that the truth is some fragile princess that needs to be placed in an ivory tower to be protected. What these cowards are really admitting is that their fragile self-esteem needs to be protected. The truth laughs at their insecurity. When has the truth ever been threatened by a dissenting viewpoint?

3 lowest rated comments: