Profile overview for Dixie_Flatline.
Submission statistics

This user has mostly submitted to the following subverses (showing top 5):

19 submissions to outrun

8 submissions to moshi

7 submissions to GameMusic

4 submissions to TrueScience

3 submissions to VideoGameMusic

This user has so far shared a total of 51 links, started a total of 4 discussions and submitted a total of 363 comments.

Voting habits

Submissions: This user has upvoted 2901 and downvoted 308 submissions.

Comments: This user has upvoted 10768 and downvoted 959 comments.

Submission ratings

5 highest rated submissions:

Perfect Dark OST Full, submitted: 12/6/2016 10:09:13 PM, 11 points (+11|-0)

Looking for books/series suggestions, submitted: 2/7/2017 7:16:37 PM, 11 points (+11|-0)

Com Truise - Galactic Melt [Full Album] , submitted: 7/22/2015 7:11:09 PM, 10 points (+10|-0)

More beer information, namely links and glasses, submitted: 4/5/2016 6:46:38 PM, 10 points (+11|-1)

Law vs Smoker (One Piece anime) , submitted: 3/11/2016 10:00:25 PM, 9 points (+9|-0)

5 lowest rated submissions:

Google AI algorithm masters ancient game of Golf (seen on programming) (nature press release) , submitted: 1/27/2016 9:57:37 PM, -4 points (+24|-28)

Rotational clock for stars needs recalibration (Carnegie Science Press Release) , submitted: 1/6/2016 1:26:17 PM, 0 points (+14|-14)

History: Einstein was no lone genius (an article looking back at some of his friends/collaborators) , submitted: 1/10/2016 11:36:04 AM, 1 points (+1|-0)

X Men 2 The Clone Wars Soundtrack, submitted: 3/2/2017 10:32:46 PM, 1 points (+1|-0)

Final Fight CD OST, submitted: 3/3/2017 9:38:26 PM, 2 points (+2|-0)

Comment ratings

3 highest rated comments:

What do you like most about Voat? submitted by Jefiakra to askgoat

Dixie_Flatline 0 points 19 points (+19|-0) ago

Night theme, and smooth mobile website.

The shills are here. When you see people talking about leaving Voat because of all the racism, ignore them. submitted by Mattvision to whatever

Dixie_Flatline 0 points 16 points (+16|-0) ago

I have blocked v/news because of the overwhelming lack of understanding of the nuances in the relationships to crime, and with correlation being edited out to imply causation. I have seen the numbers grabbed from the states, where worldwide the strongest relationship to crime is poverty.

There was an explicit tone shift site wide when coontown was banned on reddit. The problem is that other link aggregator sites are as much of a huge box as reddit.

Account Deleted By User submitted by nastymatt to ideasforvoat

Dixie_Flatline 0 points 13 points (+13|-0) ago

Okay, just for the sake of clarity, what is the actual infraction? I have the user agreement up in another window, and either I am blind/stupid, or it is not codified officially. I mean, it is certainly against the spirit of the site as I understand it, where how you can upvote/downvote is coded into equations based on past behaviour. Edit: spelling mistake.

3 lowest rated comments:

Anarchy!!! submitted by Teh_Sauce_Guy to science

Dixie_Flatline 16 points -4 points (+12|-16) ago

Sitewide rules state no spam. I consider both amalek and pv shitposting brigades spam, let alone half of the climate "debate" that happens. Unless you take a stance that is "fuck the actual user agreement and role of moderation, only cp will be removed", it will go too far for part of the site, and people will be upset.

This site is broken by design. Moderation is built in, and so is system defaults, and administration standards on how moderation is handled. Would have been great to have the public modlogs, and competing subs like askvoat/askgoat both hit v/all, with users choosing themselves where to contribute. But no, cannot have v/sciences, v/goatscience, or any equivalent to r/trees-r/marijauna pop up, that would require people to post content on the regular. Especially as defaults are already propped up by the system, aka admin, approval.

Good luck. At this point, voat just isn't a good source for peer reviewed science publications/news. Too many folks with an agenda to push, at least the papers I can see the institutions involved/critiques from other folks literally working in the field.

Then again, I am just a lurker, whose voice is equal to that of a random pv poster. I would love to see no videos/only primary sources, but that doesn't permit science in public perception or education. Honestly, if there is a subverse that is heavily moderated to only allow the actual, original publications, someone let me know. I would happily take my lurking to a smaller subverse.

All level 2 mods have been removed from v/science submitted by Disappointed to ProtectVoat

Dixie_Flatline 6 points -3 points (+3|-6) ago

MathGrunt is the only mod at /v/mathematics, a non-system sub. At least at the time of this comment. And /v/math has been an alternative sub for almost a year and a half.

Because system subs are not the only "publicly-owned" subs. And appropriate moderation has its place.

I am legimately curious on your thoughts on the relatively quiet subs that MG mods.

I will now on only delete Spam/Junk/or Self Promotion, I apologize for my earlier actions submitted by Czarpineapple to books

Dixie_Flatline 5 points -2 points (+3|-5) ago

As a rules lawyer, it is still shit. As opposed to "be nice" as a rule, it is "try to be nice"'as a rule. Still asking to be abused by you, others in the future, or a way to test boundaries.