Profile overview for Crensch.
Submission statistics

This user has mostly submitted to the following subverses (showing top 5):

430 submissions to whatever

71 submissions to ProtectVoat

55 submissions to JuiceTown

43 submissions to politics

41 submissions to theisthate

This user has so far shared a total of 608 links, started a total of 334 discussions and submitted a total of 12647 comments.

Voting habits

Submissions: This user has upvoted 27795 and downvoted 7144 submissions.

Comments: This user has upvoted 30104 and downvoted 18236 comments.

Submission ratings

5 highest rated submissions:

Welcome to Pizzagate: Fully sourced, simply organized, summary and history of main findings (12/6), submitted: 12/7/2016 1:08:58 AM, 505 points (+506|-1)

Voat Password, submitted: 5/18/2017 5:46:25 PM, 416 points (+436|-20)

One of you faggots uploaded this to imgoat and I fucking love it., submitted: 7/3/2017 3:14:53 AM, 305 points (+315|-10)

CNN was angry that the blackmailed kid posted this., submitted: 7/5/2017 7:48:57 AM, 280 points (+284|-4)

They're already trying to REWRITE HISTORY "Credible polls had (clinton and trump) within 1% on election day" - my ass, submitted: 8/4/2017 7:43:09 PM, 254 points (+257|-3)

5 lowest rated submissions:

There is no good reason to believe the Holocaust happened., submitted: 6/25/2016 3:36:24 AM, -10 points (+4|-14)

I bet you upvoated this, and it's HILARIOUS!, submitted: 4/8/2017 10:12:15 AM, -10 points (+2|-12)

If you think drunk driving is this unimaginably horrible thing, you're stupid, and you deserve to be ridiculed., submitted: 2/29/2016 9:03:13 AM, -7 points (+5|-12)

The 3-system-sub rule was written by @moe who turned out to be an @she cuck and was driven from this website. So arguments about it are kinda baseless., submitted: 10/1/2016 1:25:15 PM, -5 points (+12|-17)

Faggots that upvoat shit-tier content., submitted: 2/1/2017 9:09:33 AM, -5 points (+6|-11)

Comment ratings

3 highest rated comments:

What's she thinking? submitted by CervicalStrike to funny

Crensch 1 points 85 points (+86|-1) ago

"If I didn't look like Chelsea Clinton, I'd have been raped by now"

Cis Is Not A Slur submitted by DasReich to funny

Crensch 3 points 76 points (+79|-3) ago

nah, because we're not niggers or faggots

deleted by user submitted by she to ideasforvoat

Crensch 5 points 72 points (+77|-5) ago

Phenomenal catch. I award you the first ever @she gold!

Edit:

Archive, just in case https://slimgur.com/images/2015/08/23/912d1783483bcf7de34d7f870c45a2d1.png

3 lowest rated comments:

Stumbled upon a picture of Voat user @eagleshigh: submitted by illBehavior to fatpeoplehate

Crensch 16 points -16 points (+0|-16) ago

Butthurt niggers don't like race realists.

A mod of ProtectVoat is modding 5 system subs where previously mods were limited to 3. What do the users think of this? submitted by Datfracture to ProtectVoat

Crensch 15 points -9 points (+6|-15) ago

If we want to ProtectVoat from power hungry mods we cant exclude our own.

Who's power hungry? Are you begging the question here?

If we do this sub is worth nothing.

My points all still stand.

This is the granting of 5 system subs.

So?

One which was promised to be unmoderated.

Apparently spam is an issue that does need to be addressed. This is the current answer the admins have come to.

Just because that person asked for them.

Who? Somebody that has shown that they're not a power hungry mod?

I'm not even sure the admins knew about the subs Cynabuns already modded.

That shows a really low opinion of the admins.

Your rebuttal kinda fails.

A mod of ProtectVoat is modding 5 system subs where previously mods were limited to 3. What do the users think of this? submitted by Datfracture to ProtectVoat

Crensch 16 points -9 points (+7|-16) ago

Sorry, I posted below, but for visibility, here's the voice on the other end of things:

I'm going to have to agree here. If cynabuns or anyone so much as dances on the fucking line PV and the rest of the users will be up in arms.

That said, unlike with mods, the admins get to do shit like this with people that are trusted to not step out of line. Vetting one person for more than 3 subs is easier than vetting 2 people for a maximum of 3. IF this is what they want to do, we really don't have the right or reason to complain until something actually goes wrong.

Now my last point, and the most important:

That was written by @moe who turned out to be an @she cuck and was driven from this website. So your arguments are kinda stale.

While I'm sure @cynabuns will do just fine, I will not hesitate to break out the torch and pitchfork should something go awry.