This user has mostly submitted to the following subverses (showing top 5):
8 submissions to whatever
6 submissions to politics
5 submissions to funny
2 submissions to cheers
2 submissions to news
This user has so far shared a total of 21 links, started a total of 3 discussions and submitted a total of 541 comments.
Submissions: This user has upvoted 1059 and downvoted 939 submissions.
Comments: This user has upvoted 3237 and downvoted 2961 comments.
5 highest rated submissions:
Ron Paul on RT, "Assad had no reason to launch chem attack, unlike those who want US involvement.", submitted: 4/10/2018 6:18:25 AM, 240 points (+241|-1)
Will they ever understand?, submitted: 8/11/2018 1:59:19 AM, 140 points (+140|-0)
Which would you choose?, submitted: 4/4/2016 4:10:33 PM, 98 points (+111|-13)
DePaul SJW Ringleader Says Milo Threatens My Safety, Could Cause Massacres, submitted: 5/25/2016 10:14:36 PM, 78 points (+78|-0)
Scumbag Kuntzman, submitted: 6/22/2016 2:56:03 PM, 65 points (+73|-8)
5 lowest rated submissions:
President Trump!, submitted: 1/20/2017 9:14:05 PM, 3 points (+3|-0)
My Little Pony: Friendship is Magic Is The Most Redpilled Show On TV, submitted: 4/2/2017 9:44:18 AM, 6 points (+6|-0)
Rediculous PBS Sexism Test!, submitted: 5/26/2017 4:18:41 AM, 6 points (+6|-0)
Streetlight Manifesto - We Will Fall Together, submitted: 5/14/2016 1:07:48 AM, 7 points (+7|-0)
States ratchet up transgender battle with lawsuit against U.S., submitted: 5/25/2016 10:21:02 PM, 9 points (+9|-0)
3 highest rated comments:
Chronibus 0 points 51 points 51 points (+51|-0) ago
Honestly I find it highly unlikely that they would respect your decision anyways. I think it is far more likely than turning location services off just gives the appearance of security, while your phone's position is constantly being tracked and stored with or without your knowledge or consent.
Yes I do turn it off, but that honestly doesn't make me feel any more secure.
Chronibus 27 points 48 points 75 points (+75|-27) ago
You don't get it, he deleted his own account. That's not censorship, that's a spineless twat feeling marginalized because no one wants to hear anything he says. When you post 90% vitriolic hate, don't be surprised when no-one cares to hear the other 10.
No mod or admin forced him. He posted, got downvoated, and then pussed out like a bitch. Voat IS better off without him here.
Downvoats are not censorship. Submission, comment, and account deletion by mods/admins is censorship.
We all have the right to freedom of speech, but no one has a responsibility to listen.
Chronibus 0 points 44 points 44 points (+44|-0) ago
From the Article:
To be clear, there is no indication that Sanders himself had any connection with the Super PAC founded in his name; he once tried to distance himself from it. In fact Presidential candidates are legally prohibited from directly coordinating with the Super PACs found in their name. So it’s a safe bet Sanders and his team had no involvement in the fraud allegedly committed to Cary Lee Peterson, who created the Pro-Bernie Super PAC which turned out to be a front for fraudulent business deals.
3 lowest rated comments:
Chronibus 9 points -7 points 2 points (+2|-9) ago
That is one of stupidest comments I have ever seen.
Dont pick the lesser of two evils, pick Gary Johnson submitted by go1dfish to Libertarian
Chronibus 5 points -3 points 2 points (+2|-5) ago
This is why I can't actually support libertarians, I've tried to keep an open mind towards libertarians, I even agree with a lot of what you guys say, but you seem to have 100% idealism, 0% realism, and I just can't take it seriously anymore.
Vote for an electable candidate that will move us closer to your libertarian ideal, but the libertarians have no electable candidates. So instead of voting for a conservative (republican) who promises to return a significant amount of federal power to the states, abolish common core, and undo Obongo's unconstitutional executive orders, you all will waste your votes on someone that has a 0% chance to be president, all the while splitting the conservative vote for Shillary's benefit.
Hillary Clinton is the worst candidate for any libertarian, and you want to give her the election on a silver platter.
Chronibus 10 points -3 points 7 points (+7|-10) ago
No just no, I'm still waiting for Oreos that are just the chocolate wafers.