This user has mostly submitted to the following subverses (showing top 5):
6 submissions to videos
4 submissions to news
4 submissions to SoundMindTV
2 submissions to AskVoat
1 submissions to introductions
This user has so far shared a total of 15 links, started a total of 3 discussions and submitted a total of 325 comments.
Submissions: This user has upvoted 375 and downvoted 1 submissions.
Comments: This user has upvoted 1070 and downvoted 42 comments.
5 highest rated submissions:
Trump Steals Food from Black Kid, submitted: 9/4/2017 3:50:20 PM, 27 points (+30|-3)
GOP operative who sought Clinton's emails committed suicide, submitted: 7/14/2017 3:28:41 AM, 14 points (+14|-0)
Facebook, Tesla CEOs lead charge for guaranteed income: 'I don't think we're going to have a choice,' Musk says, submitted: 6/29/2017 4:06:20 PM, 12 points (+12|-0)
Fake News: How do YOU define it?, submitted: 2/18/2017 6:37:29 PM, 11 points (+11|-0)
Refreshing - Not all at Berkeley are violent communists. LA Based interviews conservative students., submitted: 4/29/2017 3:08:04 AM, 9 points (+9|-0)
5 lowest rated submissions:
Democrats Propose Mental Health Bill To Impeach Trump, submitted: 7/2/2017 10:43:09 PM, 0 points (+1|-1)
Test Footage Lake Washington, Seattle, submitted: 7/16/2017 3:36:29 PM, 1 points (+1|-0)
"au courant" - ambient drone jam on Juno-60, SQ-80, MoPho, & Arturia Beatstep Pro [OC], submitted: 7/11/2016 4:03:37 AM, 1 points (+1|-0)
Sound Mind TV Official Youtube Channel, submitted: 8/19/2016 11:39:23 PM, 1 points (+1|-0)
Battle of Wits: Decision 2016, Official Trailer, submitted: 8/20/2016 1:17:04 AM, 1 points (+1|-0)
3 highest rated comments:
AndinBriwel 0 points 40 points 40 points (+40|-0) ago
I'd love to sit in on a modern journalism course just to hear what's being taught these days, because, back when I took some courses, this headline would have been written more like, "Non-US citizens attempting to board US-bound flights without Visas blocked as Trump's EO forces Customs agents to follow long-standing US laws," although, that would probably be marked down for being too wordy. It used to be that a headline was intended to describe the actual facts of an event in abbreviated form, rather than slant the reader toward a particular agenda.
AndinBriwel 0 points 32 points 32 points (+32|-0) ago
Plus it's not the executive order that's blocking them - it's the current laws as passed by the legislature and signed into law by former presidents. Amazing how irate people get when existing laws suddenly start being enforced instead of ignored. Truly sad that we even need a stack of executive orders filled with line after line stating, "such and such law shall be enforced as written." Even sadder that mainstream news sources lead people to believe that writing executive orders ordering to enforce existing laws is somehow tyranny, fascism, racism, xenophobia, etc. etc. etc.
AndinBriwel 1 points 26 points 27 points (+27|-1) ago
It's kind of like racism. It's only treason when Republicans do it. When Democrats do it, it was necessary in order to keep a fair balance.
3 lowest rated comments:
AndinBriwel 4 points -4 points 0 points (+0|-4) ago
Lenses specifically for viewing computer and device monitors."glasses for gamers."
AndinBriwel 2 points -2 points 0 points (+0|-2) ago
Unfortunately, marijuana is not legal for posession, consumption or distribution anywhere in the U.S. Currently the DOJ and AG simply do not enforce current U.S. laws. New legislation and FDA action is needed to make it fully legal. We can argue all day abiut whether that should or shouldn't happen, but the way our federal government's civics work is that laws are written and passed in congress then enacted by the president. That hasn't happened yet, with regard to decriminlizing marijuana.
AndinBriwel 1 points -1 points 0 points (+0|-1) ago
You said, " I never fought against people's rights to express opinions (except ..." Let's be honest, it really doesn't matter what you put after the, "except". That seed that believes there is some opinion that should be so obviously disgusting to everyone that it shouldn't be allowed to be expressed openly will always grow into narrowing further and further exactly what type of dissent is allowed, until no dissent is allowed. As long as any particular type of dissent is okay to silence, every type of dissent will eventually be okay to silence. FWIW, I strongly disagree with the positions and methods of the WBC people, but I'm also thankful we live in a country where even disgusting, disrespectful ideas and opinions are constitutionally protected, so as long as they do their thing in a legal manner on public property, or their own private property, I would never fight to silence them using law. I would, however, present the alternate viewpoint and try to change their minds, individual by individual, as well as hope they would choose to not behave such ways. As long as my freedom is as protected as theirs, I'll be able to do exactly that.